Uh oh. It really does look like [1] is ripping off [2]. They've reordered the list a bit and added a couple.

If all other things were equal, [1] might be slightly more substantive. But not if they ripped off another post. HN has a strong bias in favor of original sources (and simple fairness!) so I think we'd better change the url. If anyone wants to make a case for the opposite, we can always change it back.

[1] http://designrope.com/design/find-stock-photos-dont-suck/

[2] https://medium.com/design-ux/62ae4bcbe01b

Edit: there is other, much more obvious blogspam at [1], so I think this is the right call. Thanks dirtyaura.