For $45 Per Month, All the Coffee You Can Drink
businessweek.com
businessweek.com
- wealthy enough to live in NYC and buy at least
one cup of coffee every single work day
- cheap enough to want to save a few bucks a month on coffee
- can't be bothered to carry a credit card around every day
- can be bothered to carry a smart phone around every day
- trendy enough to frequent NYC coffee shops
- untrendy enough to be seen using "coupons" in public
- techy enough to consider installing a coffee buying app
- non-techy enough to not have built a crazy $10k
coffee roasting-grinding-brewing setup at home
Fortunately for them, starting in NYC, that still leaves around thirty million potential customers.It'll be fun watching this play out.
I have an espresso maker (admittedly much much cheaper than that) at home, but I still drink coffee out throughout the day.
Though I also must admit to the fact that I leave in Rome where an espresso is 70-90 cents and consistently good.
Totally worth it though. The grinder (and coffee beans - buy them no later than a week after roast) are the most important part really.
To me, the most important thing is the freshness of the roast, then the quality of the grinder, and and actual espresso machine comes third.
I have a $800 setup (machine + grinder), and I roast my own beans, on an iron skillet, once a week.
It's pretty difficult to find anything outside on par with the quality I can get at home (most of the time..)
It really depends on where you are. I find that espresso in the gourmet cafés in large American cities I tried is mostly on par or slightly worse than the average espresso in Rome. The grains and the roast can be pretty good, but it's often brewed slightly long for my taste.
Espresso here is so dense it's almost solid and that's the thing I can't reproduce at home.
What's your average resting heart rate? :)
I do like a nice coffee but I'm content with instant[1] decaf (and even if I have 10 cups a day it's not more caffeine than the equivalent of a single cup of caffeinated coffee).
Not spending £3/$5 a day on coffee helps too. It means I'll pay my mortgage off 2 years early.
1. A lot more prevalent here in the UK: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-magazine-monitor-26869244
The population of New York City (5 boroughs) is 8.337 million people.
The population of Manhattan is 1.626 million people. During the day, commuters from the other boroughs and outside the city nearly double Manhattan’s population to 3.1 million people.
I can't imagine them doing this outside of Manhattan, but even if they do according to the Metropolitan Statistical Area, the entire population of the New York metro area is 19.9 million people.
The entire population of New York State is 19.651 million people.
>untrendy enough to be seen using "coupons" in public
>can't be bothered to carry a credit card around every day
Where do you get this from?
> wealthy enough to live in NYC and buy at least one cup of coffee every single work day
Brooklyn has more affordable housing and is becoming gentrified with a median per capita income of $43,567. It's easy to commute to Manhattan from some affordable neighborhoods.
http://www.slate.com/articles/business/moneybox/2014/01/new_...
Point 1: As you suggest, that's probably not such a small population to start out with, and it's not like NYC is the only coffeedrinking city on earth, or that coffee is the only drink enjoyed by city-dwellers.
Point 8: There's almost no point in paying insane NYC rents if you spend the majority of your time in your apartment.
On "techy enough", for reference, 11% of Starbucks purchases is happening through their mobile app - http://news.starbucks.com/news/starbucks-accelerates-mobile-...
I'm curious if the discount being offered to individual coffee shops is negotiated or if it's a flat rate. I would imagine that each shop charges different amounts for a cup of coffee, although maybe it falls around some uniform distribution. Certain locations probably skew one way or the other though; does a cup of coffee cost more or less in midtown or the financial district than SoHo?
I haven't been in awhile, but I remember the slice of pizza being pretty consistent from shop to shop and something about it being related to the cost of the subway. I could imagine coffee having a similar pricing scheme throughout the city.
I'm assuming these guys are targeting the more shi-shi fru-fru latte scene and not your blue collar cuppa cha which I associate with the anthora cups.
I've used them while in Israel (and I know one of the founders), I only have good stuff to say about them.
There are 2 benefits from using it, obviously the first one is the huge cost saving but the second is the fact you can drink at several places and you get to discover some good places.
When you pay for your espresso sometimes you tend to stick with the place you know have good espresso, however with CUPS I get to visit new places from time to time (mostly when I see on the app that a nearby cafe is a member) and I get to experiment with new blends.
Also I found that some places have amazing savings for members - some places will give you drinks and other things at a discount and usually will welcome you as a regular (meaning you get a better service).
I hope they spread everywhere and make this an international membership meaning if I visit NYC I can use my app from Israel.
Bringing in an app saying "I'm a cheapskate that doesn't want to pay full price" is not the message I want to give to coffee shop staff.
Hence a few customers that hang around for a while are good for drawing in other customers.
No, that would be a "great" customer in their eyes. I am merely trying to not be a jerk of a customer, while still spending some time working in their shop.
I do think a shared promotional community between the coffee shops around here (Seattle) would be good, but most are doing pretty well so no one feels any pressure.
If you had a 2 cups a day coffee habit, this works out to about $.73 a cup or $1.45 a day. Pretty good deal if you like coffee shop coffee.
Assuming you'll otherwise spend $3 per cup you'll save about $1657 a year. $2190 vs $532.90.
A small latte usually runs around $3 or so. An espresso might be $2.25-2.50. Two small lattes a day (not a lot of caffeine) would save you a ton of money a month with this plan.
If you drank even one cup of coffee a day, you'd save money with this, with either plan. A lot of people drink a cup in the morning and the afternoon, and that's where the savings really add up.
I'd personally be more interested in a hybrid plan that got me unlimited black coffee and a certain amount of espresso drinks a month. I know they have a more expensive plan with espresso drinks, but I don't want that daily. How about a $65 plan?
It's a great idea though. If you live and work in an area with coffee shops supported by this, you can basically have a monthly fee that covers all of your coffee needs. You can also no longer worry about having any coffee equipment in your apartment. Saving space is important to city dwellers.
If this came to DC, I'd strongly consider signing up for it. It's a great way to encourage people to go to non-chains, and to make paying at non-chains easier. Many of the big chains, including Starbucks, have long had ways to pay for drinks with an app. That's part of what this product does, and why small coffee shops would want to get on board.
I don't live in NYC and lattes are more like $4-$5 here.
I would imagine not all of the coffee shops on this list do pourover, and not all users will want to wait for a pourover, if there is fresh drip coffee.
Well, I do now, they only recently changed the coffee machines to ones that produce drinkable coffee. Before that I'd spend money to get decent coffee, probably far more than this service is offering. Starbucks etc in this country charge much more for regular coffee, probably due to a much lower volume / amount sold.
Third Rail (got me through my first semester at NYU)
Stumptown (I'm usually at the 8th St. spot but the Ace Hotel location is just as good)
Joe
Cafe Grumpy
Everyman Espresso
9th Street Espresso @ Chelsea Market
Note that none of these has signed up with CUPS. I doubt any of them will, either, since (I bet) there are thin margins in selling excellent coffee.
In Brooklyn there's a few more gems: Budin, Strangeways, Parlor.
When someone offers all the beer I drink for one low monthly price, I'll be signing up.
Now these people will feel justified basically becoming a tenant of coffee shops and leeching 4-5 coffees a day, leaving this startup with the empty CUPS. :)
“They say they’re drinking more coffee than before, about 20 percent more,” says Rotem (who, by the way, drinks four to six cups on a bad day). “Our users save around 30 percent on coffee.”
The american "regular coffee" is (weak) drip brewed coffee.
1. That origin is just urban legend. Americanos started in the 70's.
2. Per ounce, you're technically correct about the strength of espresso vs. drip/brewed coffee. But brews have variable strengths, and most Americans drink 12, 18, and 24 ounce drip coffees (which ends up being more caffeine than even a quad shot of espresso).
Numerous historians, including coffee history specialists stick with the WWII origin. Indeed, http://atwar.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/08/16/the-marines-secret... *provides a picture of a Marine drinking an "Americano" style coffee in 1944 and documents the role of coffee in the US Military back to at least the civil war. See also http://www.vanhoutte.com/en-ca/c-the-coffee-blog/coffee-cult....
The map they have of the indy coffee shops is something that does seem pretty useful. At least to me.
I suppose the odd abuser who parks their butt for 3-4 hrs a day in the coffee shop can be dealt with in other ways e.g. they must order food to keep a seat. If they are forced to walk to the coffee shop each time they will likely max out at a few coffees a day.
I agree that this won't make business sense with people who use coffee shops as an office.
Not the greatest deal for those users I guess.
Recently I purchased a Keurig k-cup brewer. The machine wouldn't always pump out water, so thinking I was screwed I ordered another Keurig brewer, this time the Vue. $150 for the first Keurig, $100for the second. In the meantime I purchased bullet proof coffee to give it a shot, thats an extra $45. So, in a matter of 1 week I spent about $300 on just getting my home coffee situation together. And I still go to Tim Hortons on my way home from purchasing coffee at the grocery store, or if I am out.
FWIW, I called Keurig thinking they wouldn't do anything and they sent me a brand new k-cup brewing machine that is in a box right next to me. But I do love my K-Vue machine, its the best single cup @home experience I have been able to find and I probably drink about $45 worth of coffee out of it each day.
That's a really good point though. I wonder how many people will get a coffee for a friend waiting outside on their subscription or even split a subscription.
(Psst. You should be finding ways to balance your diet, not contribute to its destruction.)
Anecdotally I've found I'm more alert [in the mornings particularly] without caffeine but cutting it out hasn't helped me normalise my sleeping patterns.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coffee#Health_risks
Seriously, my point was, whilst everyone ran around hyperventilating at the thought of saving money on coffee (oh my god oh my god oh my god cheaper coffee) they (possibly - I didn't perform any research) overlooked the quite probable (I'm actually not a mathematician) fact that they're already drinking too much, and such a scheme will cause them to drink even more (up 20% you say?).
I love sarcasm. I hope I didn't offend anyone. I'm in a weird mood today.
"Suggest" is not a very convincing word to me. Sounds more like a hypothesis than a conclusion. I highly doubt any ethics board would approve a double-blind clinical trial exploring how much coffee consumption is required to kill a human fetus in utero. Who are these monstrous Danish scientists!?
Fun fact about THC though: "[...] babies of women who used cannabis at least once per week before and throughout pregnancy were 216 g lighter than those of non-users, had significantly shorter birth lengths and smaller head circumferences."
It's right there in the conclusion "may be associated" = "they do not know if this is true at all".
Next step would be to run a double-blind clinical trial, and have an unknown-half of the subjects smoke pot and compare that to the control to test if their hypothesis is true or not. Until then, it's only conjecture.
What are you basing that claim on? None of the studies mentioned specifically in the wikipedia section specifically mention people in their 80's, and many of the studies look at total mortality.
>The coffee bean is actually a poison that the coffee plant uses to deter herbivores.
I prefer to base my decisions on epidemiological studies, than arbitrarily applying the label "poison" to things
Water from the tap is not free, it is a cost everyone pays in some way or another (built into rent or part of property taxes). Even if you still live with your parents, a dollar they spend on the water bill is a dollar less for you.
... also coffee is almost entirely water... so by your logic it's "almost free" as well.
No, not by my logic, not by anyone's logic. Almost the entire price of a cup of coffee covers the "bean" and "labour" part of it. The contribution of the cost of the water to the final cost of a cup of coffee is ... almost nothing at all.
The average 2013 annual water rates bill in England is £390, or $650.
> and free water fountains are indeed ubiquitous
I've just been on a day-trip to England, through two major regional airports. I paid about £12 in total for bottled water during the day, suffering inflated airport shop prices, because there was not a single water fountain ( I asked ). Average price of a 750 ml bottle was around £2.20 and I had to gulp-and-chuck frequently due to passing through security three times.
Coffee would have been cheaper...
Most of which is non-drinking uses of water, such as bathing, washing, dishwashing, cleaning, flushing, garden irrigation, filling the pool etc.
I just paid £170 (IIRC, I don't have the bill handy, but around that amount) for 65 m^3 of water. That's £.0026 per liter. The general recommendation is for an adult to drink 2 liters of water a day and let's say an average english family has four adults that get all their daily liquid intake from the home tap (safely overestimating, I think you'll agree), that's £7.60 a year. I'm sticking with "almost free".
Yes water costs. Jesus, point out the small things.
Edit: From the website "We pay you for each drink purchased at your awesome coffee shop "
I like it :)
Two cups of water in a blender. Add a teaspoon of instant coffee, a teaspoon of sugar, two spoons of powdered milk. Mix it all for ten seconds.
Pour in two cups. Put in the microwave for a minute.
Enjoy a delicious capuccino with a partner.
Begone, plebe! :p