Google Glass Explorer Open to US
glass.google.com
glass.google.com
Display: High resolution display is the equivalent of a 25 inch high definition screen from eight feet away.
Battery: One day of typical use. Some features, like video calls and video recording, are more battery intensive.
I don't think Google's Marketing department realizes what "tech specs" really means. When I talk about displays and batteries at bare minimum I want resolution and mAh.
If they had just put "570 mAh", someone would have posted "We have no clue what that translates to in terms of daily usage!"
They had reasonable numbers where it made sense.
(I'm not a Google employee or otherwise affiliated.)
[0]: https://twitter.com/superninjarobot/status/45610115249786060...
Not trying to be a troll I'm actually curious what people's opinions are about these.
The Glass doesn't do much computation locally, so it can't do a good job of "building a profile about you". It requires a linked phone to do most of its magic (e.g. GPS navigation).
So, really, the question should be: "does it frighten you that you're constantly carrying around one of the most sophisticated, widespread monitoring devices ever invented, in the form of your smartphone?"
The answer to that is that I acknowledge these devices generate a lot of data, and I take some moderate steps to restrict how much data they actually get. My Nexus 5 runs a modified KitKat that turns off most of the tracking stuff, for example.
In other words, if you already carry a smartphone, you are presumably not giving Google substantially more data than they would already have from your use of the smartphone. And, as I said, it seems like it's easier to control Google's access to data on your smartphone than on Glass (custom ROMs, etc.).
I haven't tried flashing my Glass yet with anything other than the stock ROM, but I know people have done this with success. So that route is open if you want to really lock it down.
What do you like about it? Is there a killer app yet? Do you think there will ever be one? Would you prefer this built into more fashionable frames?
That's about right. I wouldn't say "tiny", though -- it's a very small form factor and it's unobtrusive, for sure, but it's not hard to shift your attention to it when you want to.
It's not really "pixelated", either. The resolution is 640x360, so the apparent pixel density is extremely high when it's on a small surface. I certainly can't distinguish individual pixels, for instance.
> What's the experience like?
The experience is a bit like having a virtual assistant that you can access without using your hands. Imagine having a slightly smarter version of Google Now without taking your phone out of your pocket, for example.
> What do you like about it?
The POV recordings are super cool. I can show people what I'm working on close up and provide step-by-step directions. Normally you would need a specialized camera rig and a GoPro for that. But using it this way feels so much more natural. I helped a nontechnical friend upgrade a laptop by showing him where to unscrew and open things.
I could see a lot of applications along these lines -- e.g. imagine a Khan Academy but for car repair, filmed from a Glass.
> Is there a killer app yet?
I haven't seen a compelling reason that would make it worth $1,500 for the average consumer. I'm optimistic, though.
This is sort of meta, but I believe Glass is at least partially an experiment to discover how Glass should be used. Send it out to the most diehard people, and let them figure out how to use it and write their own apps -- then take note of that and build a business around it. "Build it and they will come" is usually a terrible strategy imo, but there are definitely a lot of developers looking at interesting ways of using it.
> Would you prefer this built into more fashionable frames?
I wear glasses and I find contacts a little uncomfortable, so the first generation of Glass was only a novelty for me: They were impossible to put on if you were also wearing your regular prescription frames.
The new generation, with prescription lenses available, made things a lot easier. Because I'm wearing it as a purely functional item, I care less about how it looks, but I can see why people would want more attractive versions. It still doesn't feel very sleek.
> you kind of look down a tiny pixelized screen
It's tiny, but it's not pixelated. It's rather high-res for its size; you can't see the pixels.
> killer app?
For me at least, the killer functionality comes in the form of wink-to-take-a-picture. Especially when travelling, it's amazing to be able to take many pictures from your POV instantly without even having to really do anything. This leaves you with a huge amount of both significant and insignificant pictures that together tell a story.
In terms of the commands, it's decent, could be better. I wish it had open-ended commands like Siri/Google Voice Search instead of being restricted to a list. Well, it sort-of does have open-ended commands by performing a "google" search. For example, in the past I've been able to say "OK Glass... Google... In five hour remind me to call Bill" and it would set a Google Now reminder. That specific feature has appeared and disappeared over time, I think they're still working on it.
I shoot pool and even in a loud pool hall I can almost whisper my commands and Glass picks them up just fine. What is neat is that Auto Awesome will stitch together clips of my game, and at the end of the night I have a highlight of my match.
My favorite thing to use Glass for is driving directions. It is about on par with the Google Navigation on Android and isn't distracting once you get use to it. Want to see the next turn? Slightly tilt your head up and it appears in your vision, otherwise, navigation will read you turn by turn directions.
Don't forget that Glass is Android, so if you are doing development on the Android platform, you don't have to do a lot of extra training to begin moving your apps to Glass.
That was just a quick, unvarnished reaction to putting Glass on and using it for a short time.
Maybe jxf can critique my initial experience and speak to how it might have evolved after using it over an extended period of time.
Is it easy to decouple Glass from prescription glasses?
How long is the typical battery life in your experience? How long does it take to recharge?
Has slow internet connectivity been an issue (via cellphone or Wifi)?
Would you recommend Glass to someone who likes tech, but doesn't feel the need to be married to it?
I wouldn't say that Glass has been transformative for me in an everyday way. It's just enabled new kinds of interactions that I wouldn't have thought about before.
To take one example, I feel that I'm much more likely to use Glass to film myself doing something when I want to show someone else how to do it. I've used it at a whiteboard quite a number of times and I've found that to be extremely helpful, especially when I'm sharing my ideas or work with others remotely.
Before Glass, I probably would take a picture of the whiteboard and email it with some thoughts.
> Is it easy to decouple Glass from prescription glasses?
On the initial version of Glass, you couldn't really wear Glass and your own prescription glasses at the same time. It just wasn't comfortable. This was a huge drawback for me since I wear glasses, so the first version was sort of a bust.
The v2 Explorer model supports custom lenses, and those lenses are very easy to add or remove. They fit snugly into a tight metal/plastic brace embedded into the top frame. It's very easy to remove or swap them. However, the lenses are expensive (iirc $400) and it's unclear to me whether they're covered by health insurance.
> How long is the typical battery life in your experience? How long does it take to recharge?
Battery life is pretty abysmal. It's maybe ~120 minutes of active use, tops. I'm using "active use" here to mean swiping, recording, taking pictures, etc. It will last for a whole day if you just occasionally wake it up to ask for directions, take a recording, et cetera.
It charges pretty quickly, but I haven't actually timed it. I'd guess 0% ⇒ 100% can be done in a couple of hours or less.
> Has slow internet connectivity been an issue (via cellphone or Wifi)?
Not that I've found. Slow Internet doesn't affect any Glass more than it does your cellphone. You can still take pictures, record data, et cetera.
> Would you recommend Glass to someone who likes tech, but doesn't feel the need to be married to it?
I think you definitely have to be a gadget nerd to pay $1,500 for this and feel like it was a good idea. The novelty wears off fast (which is partially a good thing since it's a testament to the engineering design that it feels so natural).
If you're not going to actually carry Glass around and wear it a few times a week, you're not going to get much value out of it. It's kind of pointless to put it on at home. I should mention that I walk a lot (almost everywhere: work, the gym, the grocery store, etc.) and usually don't drive unless I'm leaving my city.
Hope that was helpful!
I think I'll hold off a little longer, but I could see myself purchasing one at some point.
Thanks!
I don't know that Glass has transformed my daily routine so much as it has given me other options. Most of what a I do with Glass could be accomplished with other devices, but with Glass some things are more convenient or less distracting. Navigation and Hangouts/SMS being the two most significant features. The fact that I can listen to a message and respond to it completely through text-to-speech and voice recognition is tremendous and I rarely need to use the monitor for most tasks.
I don't have prescription lenses, but as I understand with those models, it is part of the frame and not something you can detach. I have the sunglasses visor, and that is easy to add and remove as long as you have removed them from your head.
The battery has always charged quickly for me, but with my usage I can get through the day without needing to recharge. Therefore I'm recharging over night and it has never been a problem. I do have an external battery pack that I carry with me and if I'm going to be wearing Glass in excess of my typical usage, I find I can recharge Glass while I'm wearing the device but I have to sacrifice using the ear buds as they occupy the same micro USB port.
Wi-Fi works but usually I'm tethered to my phone over Bluetooth. I have T-Mobile and good coverage in my area, so I've not had a lot of issues with slow data and can't comment on that.
I think if you want to feel like your getting your value out of it, you would want to fully embrace it. If you have that sort of disposable income, it isn't even a question. If the price makes you any hesitant, you might not feel you are getting a good ROI.
For me it was and has been worth it.
All the time! Some people have never heard of Glass and think I'm wearing a surgical implant of some kind. One woman at the grocery store thought I was blind and that Glass was helping me see via the camera.
Kids, especially, are the best. There's a lot of "wow, I'm living in the future!" or "that's so cool!" reactions, especially if their parents let them try it on.
> Any vocal hatred directed your way?
I've never had any vocal hatred, other than some occasionally derisive or skeptical looks. It's hard to blame people since wearing Glass does still look somewhat silly, even to me.
That said, Charlottesville is a pretty easygoing city, and I have the random genetic luck of being a white male, so I'm not surprised that other people who aren't in my situation might have encountered hostility.
> What's it been like wearing it in public?
I don't wear it every day or carry it around as frequently as I do, say, my phone. For example, I leave my Glass at home whenever I plan to go to the gym, because I'm worried about leaving it in my car or in the gym cubbyholes (we don't have lockers).
When I do wear it, I usually forget I'm wearing it until I want to use something on it (e.g. check my mail while I'm waiting in line somewhere, read the news, etc.). It's very unobtrusive.
No, it's not "different this time".
The latter allows you to actively interact with others around you, even if only through the passive act of stored video, which IMHO is more than just a change in social protocol.
For instance, the car-phone. Well, now the cell phone. Generally, we understand now that driving while on the cell phone is not a good thing to do. It took 10-15 years of slow driving, cops thinking people were drunk but instead just talking, and fatal accidents before we began to understand the link and creating laws.
And it goes the other way. In the 80's and 90's, beepers were not allowed in schools because "that's what drug dealers used to sell drugs." Virtually every teenager has a smartphone, capable of way more communication than a 1 or 2 way beeper did. They - probably still enforce the beeper rule today even though drug deals happen on cell phones way more than beepers these days.
Actually getting to my point, Glass wearers that wear them into Strip Clubs, high class or pretentious bars, or other private gatherings where it has grabbed headlines for being a problem are learning this the hard way. Google's enemies would pay for bad Glass press all day every day. And I'm sure they do.
Wearing Glass today is stepping into uncharted territory. You have to be more sensitive to the capabilities of the device simply due to the environment and people's expectations (You are wearing an NSA face drone!). My guess is, if you understand what and why you are wearing it and you use some judgement it won't get you into trouble.
Of course it is possible with the right application installed that you could accomplish that for either device it isn't typical.
Just as with your cell phone, you need to be respectful of others. If someone doesn't want me to film them with Glass, I don't. It has never been a problem for me and frankly once I've spoken with others and explained how Glass works, it isn't a problem for others around me.
No one cares if you are carrying a camcorder around, they care if you aren't respecting their privacy and are recording. That is a social problem and not a new technological problem introduced by Glass.
If v1 is $1500, I can see v2 being $2500
Seems you're right. It doesn't look like there was many changes so it just flew under my radar.
This sort of use, having a lot of context-specific information to do a job, is the best category of use that I can think of. It seems to me that others who need to move around, see specific information, and need their hands free, like mechanics, would also benefit.
I haven't found it useful with any software to the point that I can justify buying it as a practical device, but it has been a lot of fun to experiment with. I wore it on a 100K run a month ago, and while I didn't have enough time to write software to do what I originally wanted to do (put what I was looking at on a website every minute or so, and enable friends to hassle me during the run), it made taking pictures a lot easier.
* US only.
I understand wanting to be able to replace change the frames and lenses, which is cool. And perhaps it needs to be able to be adjusted depending on the users eye position.
But I still feel like it looks like an MVP, despite being worked on now for at least a few years and with the massive resources of Google. It also doesn't seem like the design of the outside portion of the device would necessarily conflict with development of the internal api and software.
I can't help but feel like if Apple, for example, had put out this technology it would look a lot better, even if it took longer to get to market. And I am not an Apple fanboy by any stretch of the imagination.
I also feel like they are underestimating the importance of the "look" of the device. I get that it is targeted to techies, and that as people get used to new technologies styles / opinions change. But I am pretty confident that if these devices do succeed and become mainstream, the end result will not look like a pair of glasses with a USB drive stuck on the side.
Isn't this level of support something new for Google? It is true that developer support via usenet (Google Groups), etc. is pretty good, but the customer support for Glass seems like a new thing.