> I have no use of python 3
You admit you haven't done any research, so you clearly don't have any basis for making that statement.
You admit you haven't done any research, so you clearly don't have any basis for making that statement.
Python 3, scala, and pearl all give you new ways of solving a problem. You're missing out on a lot of super cool stuff by not exploring! Outside of maybe library support, I see no reason to not to at least check out python 3.
>I rarely write anything high language besides small scripts. Python 2 does the job. If I ever were to need
>functionality of another language, great, it's fun to learn something new. Our time is limited and we must
>prioritize. Sadly we cannot invest time to learn everything (well I guess it's possible, but I rather be
>awesome in four languages than mediocre in twenty).