Ask HN: Can Bitcoin mining fund OpenSSL?
Competing with ASICs is probably not practical for SHA hashes (i.e. Bitcoin) but it seems feasible to target scrypt based currencies like Litecoin or Dogecoin where CPUs are relatively stronger.
Competing with ASICs is probably not practical for SHA hashes (i.e. Bitcoin) but it seems feasible to target scrypt based currencies like Litecoin or Dogecoin where CPUs are relatively stronger.
The cryptocurrency would not be tied to the project in any way. Users could obviously disable the mining code, and many would. How would this be different from just suggesting to people that they could mine cryptocurrencies however they like and donate the proceeds to the project?
edit: I'd also be concerned about the power usage...
Adding a Bitcoin miner to the mix would worsen the problems.
I think OpenSSL needs professional structure - organization and code-wise to gain funds and harden the system. This was discussed in other threads on HN already, i am of the opinion that they could pull this of, if they wanted to invest time into it.
For consumers i could imagine a system library or framework, which applications could depend upon. This way the mining would be encapsulated. The user could get some control options and some information dashboards. The apps would then talk to the miner and ask for a share.