StackOverflow for HTML and CSS
doctype.com
doctype.com
Of the three pages of questions currently on the site, none of them would be better described as "design" than "frontend development."
It's time we granted these separate professions the dignity of their own names instead of forcing everything into the hodgepodge of "design."
Notice how the image covers the right hand nav??
Okay, myopenid is really an independent entity, but just pretend they are part of the same company and it'll work out fine.
You can always provide options ( with/ without OpenID) for registration
1) Much smaller user base
2) The Litmus ad on the right side of every page
EDIT: The rest of me sees healthy competition and an interesting take on freemium marketing for their money-making app. :)
Since SO content is licensed under creative commons, there's no reason they can't feed in all questions into SO... I suppose it might be tricky to merge votes of the (much larger) SO audience with votes of their audience, and has interesting implications to SO's business, but it's certainly doable.
Also a much more focused user base. From an advertising point of view, do you think it's easier to sell 10,000 uniques on a general web technology site or 5,000 uniques on a site that has a very specific audience like web designers?
I can see them sharing the same database for both sites but displaying the CSS/HTML questions both on doctype and SO, but doctype restricted to CSS/HTML only. This will allow them to get content through multiple channels but allow them to sell more targeted ads on doctype.
With a much smaller subset of potential users I think you'll also find a much more "focused" group of advertisers, i.e. a smaller group of interested advertisers.
Perhaps they felt there was a lot of bad quality for HTML/CSS question and answers on StackOverflow, so they built this. I don't think so, but it's possible that the creators do.
Will this mean that HTML/CSS questions will be migrated from Stackoverflow?
Rather, I suspect that the whole site is an advertisement for their services. If they're successful, they'll gather huge amounts of google juice (for good reason, with useful links).
Further, I suggest that people should view this as good, organic marketing, rather than as some sort of evil practice because their intent is to market. There should be lots more marketing like this.
text/html MIME-type on XHTML markup
Seems like a great start to a site dedicated to web design.
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en">
If they actually served the pages with the correct Content-Type, their pages would not render in any browser.You mean it wouldn't render in IE. In any more reasonable browser, if there were any parsing errors in the XHTML then you would get a big fat error message but otherwise it would render just fine.
But who cares! it's all about HTML 5 now, baby!
http://realtech.burningbird.net/archive/200905?page=2
I could have been a bit more specific in my earlier comment as I include Firefox in the group of reasonable browsers, even though with it, you get the YSOD. I know a lot of people swear by Opera, but I don't use it, so won't include it in my reasonable browsers list purely for subjective reasons.
Though as I said, what does it matter now that XHTML 2 has been canned.
Feels incredibly... derivative. Coattails-riding.
(Forgive me, could no longer resist.)