Hacker News Reader

Comment by Workaphobia | Hacker News Reader

I haven't used linux on a desktop in several years, but my experience was that "it broke many days, something about everything". Why should this one component be held on a pedestal as make-or-break for the whole OS? Is a broken init daemon worse than a broken xorg.conf from a desktop user's perspective?

View on HN

As you said, you haven't used the Linux desktop in many years. It's come a long way in that time.

For example, editing your xorg.conf is virtually a thing of the past these days. I haven't touched it in years and run a fancy triple monitor setup.

right up until a ubuntu kernel update breaks the binary gpu driver, and you spend the next two days trying to figure out which binary or open source driver allows you to run everything the way you were at the beginning of the week. Repeat this every 6 months.

Why not give it another try now then? I have used it for years and, unlike windows, I never had to reinstall it just because something broke. And things only broke when I messed around with them, but it was always fixable. If you also use virtual machines or linux containers you will never break anything.

I intend to dual boot next time I upgrade laptops, so we'll see. I absolutely loved the customizability of the desktop environments.

But I hated worrying about graphics drivers, updates, xorg.conf, automake, and finagling my system configuration to get source tarballs to compile.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com