Lies, damned lies, and statistics!

The differing quantities on the y axes of the graphs make them quite misleading. In particular between the first and tend second where the first is a relative increase and the second is in absolute income. This gives the immediate impression that the 0.01% is pulling ahead of the 0.1% at a high rate. Looking instead at the last graph we see that the 0.1% is keeping up kinda OK.

This change in quantities also makes it impossible to compare the first and second graph at all.

Using graphs is supposed to aid understanding, not impede it.