Hacker News Reader

Interesting article, makes me curious to try the product.

But the article is written by the product guys about how they used their own product to determine what to put next into said product. A product intended to help groups determine priorities without meetings....

It's not exactly astroturfing, but....

Dogfoodturfing?

Dogfoodturfing! But we don't call it dogfooding anymore right? We call it champagning? So Champagneturfing?

Anyway, quick clarification that this is a article written by the product guys about how they use their own product in their other job. So not exactly as self referential as suggested.

-one of the product guys

Nice! Excited to try it. I suspect software tools can help teams both make better decisions, spend less time, and have more fun than a conventional meeting.

So much simpler if you simply remove 4 people from the 5-person team.

Slightly off topic, but I really dislike that initial image that gets mindlessly retweeted around.

Without any info of what is trying to be built it's useless. The minimum viable product could well be the image on the right, if say your product was trying to scale the delivery of cute looking cupcakes.

Minimum Lovable Product