Coffee Shops Pull the Plug on Laptop Users
sbk.online.wsj.com
sbk.online.wsj.com
Most of my clientèle are students so the internet access is pretty key. I have noticed a few obviously non-student types hanging out looking for jobs online. Which is cool unless they are bringing their own drinks. Which happens.
I know it would have been beneficial and a "value add" for me to know that my study group of 8 would have guaranteed seating and beverages.
You don't need that just sniff the traffic for credit card and ID information; rewrite packets with affiliate IDs link requests so that your affiliate link is used; grab copies of business docs etc.. Should be enough there to recoup your costs, especially with some blackmail thrown in for good measure.
(Yes, I know, HackerNews-ers don't like jokes, yes, it was supposed to be a joke.)
It is my observation after 5 years in the coffee house biz is that it is an inherently low margin situation.
You can't charge for wifi since the other guy gives it away free.
Alternative business models? I chose to sell more food in addition to just drinks.
I tried shows but that just drives out the regular customers.
The main thing is just educate the customers so they care about the business and support you willingly. Get a big selection of drinks, bottled etc, so people can get what they like.
The money maker is probably booze but I am not going to go there since it would significantly change the atmosphere. It might also cause problems given that we are open 24/7 and the alcohol license people might not like that.
I just block a few ports and a few of the download intensive domains.
It's like Barnes & Noble versus previous bookstores. Barnes & Noble encourages you to sit down and read books you have no intention of buying. They're smart enough to know that if you're in the store for 2 hours at a time on a regular basis, you're going to buy SOMETHING. I buy a lot of stuff at Barnes & Noble even though Amazon is generally cheaper. I go there all the time because it's such a cool place to shop, and I buy stuff because I see it and I'm like, "I WANT!"
Anyway, my impression was always that Starbucks and others had the same idea. If you let customers chill for a few hours, they're going to buy stuff. I know I do. If I'm going to sit and read or sit and use a laptop, I'll buy a good drink and some kind of snack. If I want to stay after I finish that, I'll buy something else.
I guess the problem is now customers aren't buying stuff, which sadly coffee shops are fighting in less-than-optimal ways. The problem is, I think, that there is no optimal way that coffee shop owners can do anything. Customers need to be reasonable and support the businesses that are giving them such a nice place to hang out and get online.
Don't know about BN, but I noticed recently that their Canadian version called Chapters now have substantially fewer chairs than they did a year ago. In smaller stores chairs are gone completely. There's also virtually no wall space to lean against, and they generally discourage from sitting on the floor.
> If you let customers chill for a few hours, they're going to buy stuff.
Let's say you sit for 4 hours and buy two cups of coffee. If the shop is packed, your chair could instead serve 5-6 lunch customers in a matter of just two hours, each spending considerably more than you. On the other hand if the shop is half-empty, it's nice to have people sitting around, because it creates crowd.
So if you add 1 and 1, you will arrive at the exact policy described in the article - no idlers during the lunch hours.
"As our stores and selections have expanded over the years, we have had to reduce the seating in some locations to make room for additional inventory. However, I have shared your feedback regarding our Forest Hills store with the appropriate department who will certainly keep your feedback in mind."
In any case, they barely have chairs in the Indigo stores. You'll have to go to the Starbucks that's inside the place, sit on the floor or sit on the curb near a window. It's not a very welcoming place (they're also a monopoly) and I've switched to ordering books online whenever I can.
Conversely, kicking someone out when the place is almost empty sounds like just awful PR to me. It's an intuitive distinction: "It's busy, we need space for people to sit," vs. "It's empty, feel free to hang out until it gets busy." What's complicated about that?
I think I'd aim for a tech solution of providing a ticket with purchases over X amount (coffee + danish price) with one hours free log-on. You either then pay for additional web or buy more products or leave.
Some people think it's just fine to take advantage of the public space and not use the concession.
Those people are clueless or jerks and fail to understand that the space is only as open as the owner wants it to be.
It's a fine line.
Cool; I'm never moving to NY.
It's highly unlikely that many SF or SV places could actually "get away" with kicking out their paying customers and maintain any kind of loyal customer base. It's really a symbiotic relationship -- being nice to the laptop wielders makes it much more likely that they'll be nice to your business in online reviews and contexts.
Think they'll become loyal customers once they're employed?
Weird business idea: figure out how to be supportive toward the down-and-(temp.)out techies (and their laptops) so you have a tech-friendly reputation. [ If you don't, some of them will open shops that will compete with yours. ]
From having talked to people, I think more often it's people making stuff, being creative, getting stuff done - some amazing projects and products get created in cafes.
I love seeing laptops out in coffee shops.
When a cafe is welcoming of laptops, I always tip better: paper only.
Maybe the economy has gotten bad enough recently to tip the scale too far.
And the rule of no outside food and drink makes perfect sense.