I suspect it is socioeconomics. Bowling is kind of viewed as a lower-middle class sport, and the economy has wiped the lower-middle class out.
I suspect it is socioeconomics. Bowling is kind of viewed as a lower-middle class sport, and the economy has wiped the lower-middle class out.
The only things that really seem to distinguish a great bowler are his/her speed and accuracy. That's basically it. There's no Michael Jordan running on thin air with his tongue out. There's no massive 7' Shaq shattering glass with the force of his dunks. There's no Peyton Manning watching over his team, radiating some austere strategic wisdom (barring this last Super Bowl...).
Frankly, I'd (very seriously) rather watch professional juggling than bowling.
Finally, the overall style of bowling as a sport is decidedly 1970s midwest America. The US is undergoing probably an unprecedented urban trend right now. As profoundly shallow as it might be, bowling is just not sexy at all.
They used the blue dyed oil on a televised match a few months ago as an attempt to show it, but I feel that gives the bowlers an unfair advantage.
If there were a way to show the oil moving in real time to both the TV and live audience, I think you could start getting people interested in the game at a high level. Much the same way embedding little cameras in a poker table enabled the audience to see a live poker game unfold.
I'd also like to see the PBA fully embrace video streaming, and no, Xtra Frame doesn't count. I want to be able to watch follow an individual player throughout the 4 days of a typical PBA tournament. I have my favorite bowlers and I want to see their scores in realtime. I want to see how the lanes are changing and how the bowlers are adapting.
I love the sport; I've been bowling since I was very young. But, I too, would rather watch anything other than a PBA telecast.
I think that's the whole story right there.
Isn't professional juggling specifically supposed to be entertaining to watch?
I thought the complaint was that the center has been pushed a bit downwards, which would suggest to me that the lower-middle is at least as robust as ever.
My completely unfounded guess for the reason is due to fashion. It used to be OK to acknowledge one's working-man lifestyle (coincidence that the article cites bowling's heyday at the same time America was enjoying "Urban Cowboy" and "Smokey and the Bandit"?), but we're all supposed to pretend to have more sophistication today.
I don't find this true, in my experience. The "smear" that used to characterize the people I knew is gone. There are a bunch of white collar "professionals". There are a bunch of low wage "service" people. However, the vast chunk of blue collar factory workers, machinists, welders, steelworkers, miners, etc. seems to just be gone.
It probably could be at the level of golf if bowling companies were able to sell high-end products. But for better or worse, bowling is a pretty cheap sport to play and doesn't require owning any gear whatsoever.
It's always hard to tell if these things are actually less popular than in decades past, or if it's just that I'm no longer in elementary and middle school.