Hacker News Reader

Comment by alien3d | Hacker News Reader

most programmer will stop at age 35 and become management level.kinda wastefull because experince can speed up deployment and debugging.

View on HN

> most programmers will stop at age 35 and become management level.

That's not going to happen to "most" anything. There are always fewer spaces at the next level up the pyramid. Usually drastically so. What's the "programmer" to "manager" ratio where you are?

A common misconception here is that we all get to be CTO someday.

Well if you don't, then you weren't an "A" player. And who cares about you then?

Especially with inverted demographics hurting anyone under 30.

Most of the CTO's I know quit from somewhere to become the CTO at their current place of employment. I don't recall meeting anyone who "moved up through the ranks", but perhaps I'm not fully informed or can't recall those instances.

I'm not even talking about "moving up" to become CTO or some other exec. I'm talking about just getting into that game.

Not to mention that lots of programmers make bad managers.

Okay, I hit 35 on June 2nd, and become a 'Risk Manager' on June 1st. Why? Because I realise that, in corporate life, technical skills are a serious roadblock to a career.

(Okay, I'm drafting a business plan on the side for a consultancy. I am hoping the non-programming job will allow me capacity to work outside my liberal flexitime hours. All advice welcome)

"technical skills are a serious roadblock to a career". You've discovered Putt's law: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Putt%27s_Law_and_the_Successful...

Software engineers shouldn't undervalue having vertical business domain knowledge.

Beware of the "Peter Principle" though (people rise to their level of incompetence).

Reply on news.ycombinator.com