Please don't use pie charts
jgc.org
jgc.org
I, personally, am in love with the "Trends" pie chart on mint.com. It allows you to drill down and expand each wedge of the pie into its sub-components. I feel like this would be much less meaningful if it were expressed as, say, a bar graph.
http://www.edwardtufte.com/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=0...
I agree! I never understood why a pie chart (with the principal value of showing the relative size of each chunk compared to the others) would be rotated and distorted in such a way to make the relative sizes indiscernible.
Pie charts have such limited value... I wonder if part of the reason they became so popular was how simple it is to draw one - if you have a protractor, pencil, and a calculator, it is a very quick process. When you are no longer limited by drawing time, though, there seems to be very little worthwhile in the design. I wish they never made the transition to the computing age...
Yes, of course you should use the right tool. You could also say that it boils down even further to something like "don't be stupid". The fact that some abstraction covers a point doesn't mean that said point has no value in and of itself.
Pie charts is a good tool when you want to show the relative sizes of (a small number of) unordered data points. It is a bad tool for displaying Word features introduced per version, since it is not really interesting to see how many features were introduced in Word 2.0 relative to Word 95. (Never mind that "number of features" is pretty hard to quantify.)
A pie chart would be interesting to show e.g. the market share of Word compared to OpenOffice.
But the article, which my comment is for, says "Please don't use pie charts" which is not the right idea OR the heading is too sensational for HN IMHO.