North Dakota oil boom: American Dream on ice
bbc.com
bbc.com
Boom towns are full of all kinds of awful, I would imagine many similar articles were written about the gold rush and other mass movements of workers but that situation is only temporary and in the grand scheme of things not very important.
Does America want to be an energy producer? If not are we willing to do business with countries that do, that might also have problems with Americans? Also, ss this the kind of energy America wants to produce?
To me it boils down to national security (or terrorism if you must) and prices. Having the security of energy in your backyard comes with tradeoffs. I'm not sure what the right answer is, but could we all stop focusing on the strip clubs and instead look at the bigger picture?
Terrorism can be a problem of course, but I would be more concerned about the grid than our access to oil.
If the country that is selling you oil/energy is doing bad things this reliant nature of our relationship also ties our hands when it comes to calling them on their shit. See the Ukraine or pretty much any geo-political matter.
Isolationism isn't the only solution, but inter-dependance has it's own drawbacks.
[edit: added "in part"]
They (US & EU politicos) will talk big about climate change in public of course, but their strategy and calculations in private can go a very different direction.
If it was within my power to turn back the clock and make the calls that needed to be made at the time, I'd have never let that boom start.
To say that the northwestern third of North Dakota has been destroyed is an understatement; It brings me to tears just thinking about it.
I'm 90% sure it's electric (As opposed to gas, which is quite common in the area, especially the more rural areas).
My sister however does live in an area where gas is common and they have a 1,000 gallon tank for it. It costs them about 4 times what they normally paid for it. What the cost is exactly, I'm not sure. I know it used to be cheap and what what it is now is really expensive.
That said, nearly every kilowatt of power that is actually sourced to ND is coal or hydro.
Also, I'm willing to pay for the cost of advancement away from oil. If my energy bill doubles because the majority of my power is wind, solar, hydro with support from nuclear and gas, then so be it. If I have to pay 6 dollars a gallon to keep the boom away from my home, it's a price I'd gladly pay.
I don't make insane money. I pull in about $44k in a place where a mid-range apartment costs $1,000 / month to rent. I'm not swimming in cash, but I'll make it all work if I can have the home I knew when I was a teenager back.
Please explain how you see this?
"Hi, I'm Tom Becker, I'm here to do X" "Becker? Do you know Bill Becker?" "I do! He's my cousin!"
And immediately everyone is totally disarmed and we have common ground even though we live half a state away. Everyone really does have no more than 1 or 2 social links separating everyone else in a region. Your last name is a really powerful device in a conversation with other people and it's really awesome to have that kind of link to a people in a country that otherwise is completely devoid of that and culture in general.
With the huge influx of people in north western ND, that is no longer true of that area. In fact, my 'regional social bubble' has been effectively cut to about 70% of it's original size because the people that live west of me aren't the same people that used to live west of me.
This brings me to my second problem: People don't want to, or literally cannot stay in their home towns.
It has become very, very expensive to live west of Glen Ullin, and if you are a woman, it has also become very dangerous. Renting in Dickinson costs comically huge amounts of money and if you happened to own a house in Williston, well your property tax has went up by a factor of four so sucks to be you if you can't pay that any more. If you want to purchase gas in Dickinson or any further west, you need to prepay for it, which is an idea that didn't exist in the region before all this, but again, crime has become an issue.
Somehow, Williston is still operating in the red because infrastructure costs money turns out and paying for all the public services required of a city that is growing at the rate it is is crippling, not to mention the police force is way understaffed because the kinds of people that are attracted to these kinds of jobs are also the kind of people that tend to commit a cocktail of felonies in a state where crime may have well used to not exist.
Meanwhile, despite all these problems, the state has decided to play super nice with the oil companies and reduce tax rates for them no less than twice since they've shown up for reasons I can't quite comprehend (again, Williston and other cities still operate in the red because of all of this.)
The existing infrastructure is going to total shit and the roads are incredibly dangerous, especially during the winter months. We have trains that are blowing up in cities 250 miles away for reasons that may or may not be caused by this boom. There are a dozen oil spills every month and the drinking water has become very questionable for cities that are in the Bakken region.
All this on top of what has been done to the environment proper. What used to be rolling plains is now a shitshow of wells and flares. Unlike coal mines, which are required to restore the prairie to a state that was equal to or better than how they found it, no such strict laws exist for oil companies, so guess what it's going to look like 30 years from now. I mean, you literally have coal companies like Great River displaying the state of their mines after restoration and bragging about how much better everything is after they leave with 'before, during, after' picture galleries. That will probably not exist in the oil company's PR portfolio.
Finally, the state was operating in the black before all this. We didn't need this at all. What the state should have said is something to the effect of,
"You can come and drill, but you will pay for everything you do. Any cost of anything, whether it be infrastructure, property taxes of existing citizens, expansion of emergency and civil services, eventual decommissioning costs, spills, accidents and problems and all their associated costs -- those costs are your's to take on, plus taxes. If you don't want to pay all that, then kindly consider your requests denied until a point where you are willing to actually pay for the hell you are about to unleash on the state."
That of course didn't happen, so now we are here. We have a third of the state converted to a total wasteland, their residents effectively told to 'deal with it', all for reasons that almost certainly come back to the almighty dollar that only a select few will actually ever see.
Fuck the oil boom
I guess that might be for you. I grew up on a reservation and knew people from other reservations, but I never had that social network you talk of. I did almost get my butt kicked in a small neighboring town, because I had my high school jacket on[1]. This quaint Mayberry stuff wasn't in my experience. I have noticed that the border towns[2] tended to be happy that we spent our money there and liked to raise funds by setting up checkpoints on the days welfare checks were distributed[3].
My perspective is that there are a lot of new people and some are good and some are bad. Its time to rediscover the folks around you. I’ve noticed that quite a few of the new arrivals are pretty nice people.
> This brings me to my second problem: People don't want to, or literally cannot stay in their home towns.
This is a big problem for any boom area (Hi, Silicon Valley folks). The state needs to get on the infrastructure a lot faster than it has been. All these superficial articles are not doing us any favors. God help us if we get another flood year. I can only imagine what the Army Corps of Engineers will screw up this time.
> We have trains that are blowing up in cities 250 miles away for reasons that may or may not be caused by this boom.
Talk to BNSF about deploying the newer railcars or start talking about pipelines[4].
> There are a dozen oil spills every month and the drinking water has become very questionable for cities that are in the Bakken region.
I would need to see stats and actual enviormental reports, not the fakery done in PA.
> Finally, the state was operating in the black before all this. We didn't need this at all.
Yes, we did. North Dakota was dying and nothing was bringing people back.
More importantly from my perspective, the tribe nearest the oil fields now has a source of money that the state cannot force into “social programs”. The casinos were a moral compromise and the draconian restriction of not being able to pay tribal members with the money as a dividend on a tribally run business was vicious. Besides, reservations were located in places that are not next to the bigger cities[5]. I don’t know what the state is charging for taxes[6], but the tribe is doing fine with its fees.
Better, most tribal members are making money for themselves and not stuck in welfare.
1) I’m white, my biological dad is a enrolled member of a tribe
2) bordering the reservation
3) Without public transit, poor people drive cars that often are not well maintained and often have safety violations
4) amazing about the billionare friend of POTUS that owns a railroad
5) when placing a population that could stage an uprising, it is best to keep it away from the “good folks”.
6) I understand it might be a bit more than Texas which could be a problem with Texas moving to fracking
I go back home a couple of times a year and driving through cities like Dickinson is an experience. It's barely recognizable. The roads weren't designed to handle the traffic they're seeing. The expansion these places are seeing is insane.
I'm glad I moved away before the oil boom, it isn't a place I would want to live today.
7.9% increase last year (10.9% increase the previous year) except for rape (which they seriously need to deal with by dropping the hammer on these people).
I went out to western North Dakota a couple weeks ago. I've been in Chicago during rush hour, but I've never experienced that type of traffic. It was unreal.
Williston has always been a shhole. I am getting a little sick of the "oh, it was such a nice town". I lived in a small town near there in the late 70's and it always had a dark side.
http://www.economist.com/news/christmas-specials/21591748-th...
This is the key point worth acknowledging, in my opinion. It's difficult to maintain a balanced perspective when sources like these emphasize almost entirely positive effects and sources like OP emphasize almost entirely negative effects.
PS: Restrict it to christian priests and you still don't really find consensus. "More than 80 per cent were happy with the idea that God the Father created the world." http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1403106/One-third-of-...
Consensus alone means nothing.
Maybe switching to a somewhat cleaner source would slow down movement towards green sources, but it seems like using CH4 is an overall win given what it's a substitute for.
Natural Gas being deployed instead of solar or wind? Bad.
Natural Gas being deployed along side solar and wind? Best case.
One day the price of natural gas is going to rise again and people are going to be stuck with combined cycle natgas generators that are too expensive to run.
Williston is what I would consider to be the Wild West. Instead of horses, everyone has trucks. Heck, I had a company truck as well. And it is dirty. People always have a mouthful of chew. Last time I worked out there (2011), housing was expensive and in shortage. The major players at the time were in the process of building up man camps to circumvent this. For those who are unfortunate in not finding a place, you would sleep in a truck. There was this shower service that was started up this entrepreneurial kid; trailers that were outfitted with private shower stalls that were charged by an hour. It's definitely different than the pampered lifestyle one is used to.
Reading from the comments, some people have talked down the blue collar workers that work in this industry. Yes, they may not hold the same education as many of us, but they are some of the most down-to-earth, dependable, hard working people I have met. They are definitely more "real" than many of the people I've met in the city. This is the type of industry where you have to go in and prove yourself out of greenhorn status. Once you do that, you earn yourself great coworkers and friends. Otherwise you are going to have a bad time. You also need a thick skin and able to dish back, since this is the oil patch after all.
The two things that were good about Williston: Walmart (I know, I didn't appreciate Walmart unti l I lived in the inner West states. They are your only and best option you have) and the 24-hour diner nearby it.
They also have managed to bring in a crime problem that didn't previously exist. As 'real' as they people may be, there is a larger portion of them that are prone to committing felonies it seems. That's the problem people have with them.
And it's not a function of population either. Looking at Fargo, Metro area population 220k~, we see a crime rate significantly lower than that of Williston and even Dickinson.
As for me, I used my downtime to rest up and count the days that I am rotated out of Williston.
http://www.buzzfeed.com/susanelizabethshepard/wildcatting-a-...
It's a difficult situation for me because I know a lot of people that rely on this work to support themselves and their families. Without oil, gas and coal many of these communities would collapse. At the same time, I know the effect this has on the environment and I support us moving towards cleaner, renewable energy sources. I don't have a solution for any of this, just a lot of empathy for everyone involved.
Most of the communities that existed before the oil boom would have been fine without it. Some small towns were slowly dying, but the major players and what was effectively their suburbs (South Heart's relationship with Dickinson for example) left the region stable.
For those that were slowly circling the drain of death, they've been handed a fate even worse.
America is going to hell in plenty of ways... along with most of the rest of the world. This story isn't exactly a big contributor or indicator of those progressions, though.
But I get it, CA is awesomely green in every way... great for them. I'm not fan of Texas but the shear size of the state and population means they have several economic "identities".
Texas is neither the largest state by area (that's Alaska, Texas is #2) nor population (that's California, Texas is, again, #2). Nor is it #1 in most economic categories (e.g., by GDP California is #1 and Texas, again, #2 [1]; by GDP per capita, Texas is #19 -- #20 if DC is included as a "state" -- and Delaware -- or, if DC is included, DC -- is #1. [2])
> #1 per capita energy consumption
Size doesn't really justify being #1 in per capita anything, but then again, according to the US Dept. of Energy [3], Wyoming is #1 per capita energy consumption overall, and Texas is #6.
EDIT to add:
> but also #1 in green (wind) energy.
Texas is actually #1 in wind energy (probably not #1 in "green" energy, which normally means renewables; Texas has a very high ratio of wind to total renewables.)
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_by_GDP
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_between_U.S._states_...
[3] http://www.eia.gov/state/seds/data.cfm?incfile=/state/seds/s...
If we take a breather, and look at the parent comment, it was about how large America is and how in this one area things might be very wrong, but many other areas of the US there are things that are going very right. The American dream is not tied completely to the drilling for gas in ND.
Or provide one of the other services (food, entertainment) well.
Essentially, once the oil basin was discovered, all the major US oil producers stormed the region and immediately began setting up shop. As a result, they also offered massive salaries for anyone willing to come up and work, especially young guys. He told me the major draw at first was truck drivers, who were making six-figures easily (side note: the roads in and out of town were decimated due to the amount of trucking passing through). Obviously the first ones to get established are going to get the most benefit from fracking the region, so it's easy to see why they offered such outrageous salaries.
Likewise, I remember him telling me about how there was absolutely nothing to do up there besides hit the bar, so that also pushes salaries higher.
I know software (and its wages) is the all-powerful blood of the Earth, according to HN, but don't be so skeptical of the power of supply and demand.