Sales for Hackers
stormpath.com
stormpath.com
Then recently someone on HN mentioned this book "Go For No" by Richard Fenton and Andrea Waltz. I have it on my kindle and it changed my attitude towards sales. I have yet to get traction with my bootstrap but I am learning more with each conversation. Rejection is so much more informative than A/B testing you web page.
Your time is your most valuable commodity and you will have less as you get older. Don't waste it on unqualified leads, ever.
Spending too much time in one can leave the other feeling under-utilized. I'm guessing I'll end up needing to have engineers on contract and have 70:30 business dev to engineering ratio or something. I'm not sure but that ratio seems about right given how much time the social networking side needs to keep money coming in consistently.
Plus, there's the downtime needed to make the mental switch from one to the other. Or maybe just contract out all the work and do my various hobby projects on the side to satisfy the engineer in me.
Edit: Cold Calling: Things I learned in a non-tech venture.
Visualizations, and rehearsals (mental and physical) of each step of the calling process were very, very helpful. One click dialing straight off a spreadsheet of cold contacts made things easier, too.
After getting through the first 100 or so numbers dialing started to give me a rush. Fear was starting to be replaced by excitement. Very curious experience.
One other thing. I was told to expect, and found, roughly speaking, half of the numbers I dialed on an industry specific list of small to medium sized companies, no one answered. Another quarter were busy or couldn't talk and it really had nothing to do with me.
These numbers held across a few different industries. Since I was rather likely to NOT reach someone for a conversation I found it much easier to dial.
If you just keep following up and never stop, you'll likely annoy someone who is probably not interested in what you're selling and you'll likely get spam filtered.
Sometimes we just have to take the hint :)
We then tried showing up some data about prospects in our app, attached android, ipad images, at least they could say that they are not interested at this time, or they may decide and let us know sooner. Some of them pick our call, clarify their understanding about apps. Some of them are going ahead and asked for price, how to get the apps working on their mobile device.
For each prospect, our sales rep has to spend a lot of time preparing the data that is relevant to our potential prospect, to send the screen shots.
This article is very good to target high potential prospect who can give us good business even if we spend a 2-3 days to prepare the data for them. Since we lack in sales, we don't know the best way to get this done. For each prospect we have to spend a lot of time, if they are not interested, we are losing our time.
Similar applies to the authority question. The larger the department/company, the less likely that a huge sale will be authorised by just one individual. Although the contrary can also sometimes be true in this case - very small/new companies may have the directors signing off on all the major purchases.
The biggest mistake I've made with sales is getting nervous and talking too much. Ask open-ended questions and let the prospect do the rest.
Can't stress getting to the top quickly enough. It's so rare for a sale to close from the bottom-up in my personal experience.
If anything, that became more of a negative because it meant that I had to spend more time managing those conversations rather than analyzing the fit for their product.
I would change "getting to the top quickly" to "identifying the decision maker and getting to them quickly".
http://www.amazon.com/Influence-Psychology-Persuasion-Busine...
I know there are some techniques I use from the book that helped me significantly.
if ( (budget >= price) AND (Authority.isInvolved()) AND (match(features, needs) AND (timeframe == now)) {
proceed();
} else {
quit();
}Best of luck to all.
Example:
Budget:
Validate leads. Yes, of course. However, I don't like that asking someone how much they're willing to spend. Not under this form, at least.
This information is none of anyone's business than the prospect (speaking as a prospect). However, it's an important information, so the salesman needs to adapt to get that information. He might not ask for it, but needs to get it.
Some cues on the means of the prospect can be visible, but this can be deceiving. Bling bling people often are broke overcompensating folks.
Conversation fu can also be used indirectly to get the information, but the prospect can be good at that and drop just the right amount of hints to convey he can afford it..
Authority:
Speaking to the right person. Yes. However, this is done on two sides: Convincing the pockets, using the daughter as leverage.
Asking the father "Besides yourself, who else is involved with the purchase" isn't, in my opinion, the right form.
Because it's like asking a man "Is your wife grabbing your ?". A man will never admit someone else holds the power. Those who do, the "I won't lie to you, she's the boss.." are way beyond the point of no return, but at least, they're at peace and you can go for it.
But with those who won't admit to that, you need to be careful not to scratch the ego. The problem isn't the fact he has no power inspite him being the earner, the problem is that you mustn't know. So you always make it seem it's his decision, and won't acknowledge the fact the wife or the daughter chose. He must feel good about the decision he -someone else- made.
With this, too, observation is key. You see a man with his daughter and wife, and you know. You see how they interact, and you see who's a daddy girl or a bossy wife, who's a wimp and who's dominating and who'se domineering. These are all subtleties one observes.
Needs: Agree. How about a Cayenne ? It's fast, it's German, it's luxurious (a Porsche, after all) and it's got 4 doors. You drop the kids, and pick-up a young lady a two minutes later.
Handling objections is of paramount importance (Sometimes triggering them helps, too. I know it may sound weird, but triggering an objection on a point early on when the objection doesn't really matter (because there's no action tied to it at that time) is useful for when you go over that point later because the objection was already triggered earlier (or about another, less important point)).
I haven't sold a $100M for anyone, but let's say I have a slight knack for enabling people to do what they really want to do, but didn't find a way to.