Codename: BlueMix – IBM's New PaaS Offering
ace.ng.bluemix.net
ace.ng.bluemix.net
I've used both, both as a developer and as a sysadmin and I have to say I like Openshift more. Mainly because of the ease of setup and the reliability. Cloud Foundry had issues for me.
That's just my initial thoughts though. Now I need to sit down and actually deploy something to it.
At least one aspect was a bit amusing: http://pic.twitter.com/iPqCk1J3x8
Have any of you HN'ers been accepted into the beta? Thoughts?
Why is there a time limit of a few minutes on the confirmation code? I feel like I have to race the clock in order to register.
I wish they had made a separate registration that matched the actual product's less-corporate style.
@7:29am - Thanks for your interest in Codename BlueMix. We hope to reward your courage soon with a membership. We will be in touch shortly.
@7:37am - You have been accepted as a BlueMix beta member.
If they dont want to become "just another AWS" they'll have to start integrating some of these features in order to get devs to switch ...
https://hub.jazz.net/project/pmuellr/bluemix-hello-node/over...
The goal with the demo is just to show you how to get node code running on BlueMix; what code (in what language) you run is up to you!
I had early access to this so I could write an article for their developerWorks site on using the MEAN (mongo, express, angular and node) stack to build a polls app. The platform's not perfect, but its good to see IBM going in the right direction with this sort of stuff.
To deploy Python applications to BlueMix, use
$ cf push -b https://github.com/joshuamckenty/heroku-buildpack-python
Also, I don't see any pricing, so that's a little nervous-making.Nice that you get an 8GB memory allocation to play with, though, shared amongst your various apps.
edit: Ahh > http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/why-ibm-phasing-o...
The experience of deploying the Node app on Bluemix is very reminiscent of a Heroku deployment, IMO.
"A platform where developers can act like kids in a sandbox"
That sounds like they consider play a necessary evil.
They explain why IBM did this in entreprisey wording. As if development should be slow and developers shouldn't be left alone 'Playing'.
I'm so desperate for an alternative that I would rather put my data in North Korea if they had a cloud offer.
Thanks.