If it is considered wrong/unethical to film on private property in Idaho - why would they legislate for a specific industry? Shouldn't filming video on private property be illegal all across the board in Idaho if the problem is about basic rights?
From your description, it seems like there is no "breaking and entering" to prove. Trespassing, falsified resumés etc., but there are already laws for that, and the laws themselves don't make it easier or harder to trespass.
And that there is no 'breaking and entering' was actually my point. Farms are not houses; yet still private.
This is like legislating to make URL modification illegal 'hacking' and justifying it by saying programmers are too expensive.
If our society wants people to have stronger protection for large unsecured areas, they it should apply to all such areas.
Correct, it is an inherently non-private location, and therefore not entitled to any "privacy".
Anyone can put under surveillance anything visible from anywhere they're allowed to be. Kids, cats, and cops alike, no permission, no warrants, nothing.