Putin's propaganda presented this as infringement of ethnic Russians and that new government are fascists which made illegal turnover.
Three main nationalities in Crimea are ethnic russians (1.5m), ukrainians (500.00) and tatars (who actually lived in Crimea, before Stalin repressed them in 1944-1950). Also Russia pays Ukrainian government for keeping part of their fleet in Crimea.
So, these forces "invaded" Crimea, but the had no russian markings and it was again presented, as these are volunteers who help to protect Crimea from west-ukrainian fascists (yeah, right, volunteers with guns, helicopters and armored cars). The Crimea parlament was capruted and now is ruled by pro-russian marginals who declare Crimea autonomy and that is should be a part of Russia. The officially request help from Putin to protect themselves. And yesterday Russian Council of federations allowed Putin to invade Crimea. But post-faktum it already happened.
BBC video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GkiSPMpTp_I Sasha Biliy @ Rovno government meeting(UA language): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=01is0p0mzJQ
(and much more)
Of course, people of Crimea, Donetsk, Kharkiv, Dnepropetrovsk, Lugansk, Odessa see that violent nazi power and want to detach from the new Ukraine.
Sasha Biliy is not the whole country or doesn't represent even a city. He is just a mad guy who walks city streets with empty machine gun. This video made a huge resonance in Ukraine, so even our Interior minister [secretary of state] (Arsen Avakov) reacted to this on his FB page saying that this is absolutely inappropriate. And i am sure, that this man will be in jain really soon.
I ask this question every person who speaks about nazis in ukraine. IF there are nazis, who hate russian people - WHY there was NOT A SINGLE attack on russian embassy in whole ukraine? Why not a single russian was killed by evil ukrainian nazis?
There is also another series of interesting posts here: http://www.reddit.com/r/worldnews/comments/1zad2p/ukraine_pu...
It's not HN, but it beats the worthless commentary that I've seen on TV while they show stock footage of tanks rolling around (which I haven't heard is the case).
The reporting of wars and revolutions by the people involved themselves is causing a huge change in journalism - some news journalists I know are starting to question how to involve reader stories and reader opinions in reports without ending up with an incoherent cacophony of people shouting their opinions, with those the loudest to shout being those who are heard. Scepticism, source checking and editorial independence are needed more than ever when you are able to hear an entire crowd at once.
The use of twitter is also growing to cover conflicts like this - I find it really interesting just how far newspapers are now going in using twitter as a source (and verifying afterwards). Look at all the twitter refs in this live feed. [1]
Web images/video of conflict, and message boards such as this one have become the new battleground in establishing what the world thinks about a conflict, and techniques of manipulating them with false comments, hacking and false information are growing more sophisticated - RT was hacked today [2], and some protests have been reported as fake [3].
I have no position on the conflict that I'd like to share as I don't know enough about it, but an informed public is more essential than ever if the world is on the edge of war.
[1] http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/02/ukraine-warns-r...
[2] https://twitter.com/RT_com/statuses/439981255052898304
[3] https://twitter.com/howardamos/status/440128242620825600