Email (let's drop the hyphen) (2003)
www-cs-faculty.stanford.edu
www-cs-faculty.stanford.edu
Ding ding ding.
Just a few more to consider:
* webpage vs web page
* website vs web site
* lifestyle vs life style
* Asian-American vs Asian American
* e-commerce vs ecommerce
* cannot vs can not
* real-time vs real time (as one of the comments in this thread).
http://www.quickanddirtytips.com/education/grammar/e-mail-or...
http://www.reuters.com/article/2007/09/21/us-britain-hyphen-...
http://www.glendalenewspress.com/news/tn-gnp-aword-20100901,...
My English teacher tells us that we change grammar as we progress as a society. Articles from the 1700s will be different from the one from 1800s, 1900s and 2000s.
Also, writing style and grammar are also regional and industry dependent.
Some note from Oxford dictionary (http://blog.oxforddictionaries.com/2011/10/hyphens-in-the-he...)
> Let’s just step back from the hyperbole: how do dictionary-makers decide whether noun compounds should be hyphenated or not? It’s not an arbitrary choice: for our current English dictionaries, such as the free one on this website, Oxford’s lexicographers assiduously check the evidence of billions of words of today’s English on a huge database, the Oxford English Corpus. If they see that in the vast majority of cases, a noun such as ice cream is written as an unhyphenated two-word form, then this is the spelling they will select to appear in the dictionary.
That said, I never wrote "E-mail" with a hyphen, though I still can't stop myself from capitalizing Internets.
As an American, I figure that the most efficient (or maybe you prefer "laziest") option will win in the end. This means dropping spaces and hyphens whenever possible.
Given this, I'm going to say "realtime" will eventually win. It's apparently already in my dictionary since it's not even marked as a spelling mistake.
It's hard to say whether it benefited me or not, but I'm sure of one thing - I don't waste time on email anymore.
Not by hacking email, but there should be a way to do that using the following.
enable imap in gmail (pull email from the gmail box every "x" hours).
That email goes into a different box, the one you check whenever you want but it's only updated every "x" hours. So you would quickly realize there is no point in checking that box.
Other ways might include setting up a vps that receives the email but delaying the forwarding to gmail until a specified time. So the vps setup email (using sendmail or whatever) simply holds and forwards to gmail every "x" hours.
I'd have to think this through but there is definitely a way using various unix tools, smtp, cron, imap to do something like this. (Probably many ways for sure).
So in other words you are either grabbing from gmail to another mail host every "x" hours (and then possibly forwarding to another gmail box) or you are sending all mail to another mail host (and then sending it to gmail).
If you don't need gmail in particular there are probably a few ways to do this with shell scripting and knowledge of smtp, imap, cron etc.
'I don't even have an e-mail address. I have reached an age where my main purpose is not to receive messages.' --- Umberto Eco, quoted in the New Yorker
If that's not what you meant, carry on. ;)
Is that really still a thing?
Keeping the bank account used for direct debit for the domains above zero should not be that hard I would assume.
On topic - I haven't called it "e-mail" since the 90s, and usually just call it 'mail.'
There will never be a canonical English. Talk the way you want to and the way that is most effective for you, not the way people tell you to.
Of course the pronounciation is very different.
$0.48 = H $0.49 = I
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/03/Knuth-che...