Feferman usefully explores the presuppositions and equivocations of both Godel and Nagel in their exchanges over the mathematical mind. In the end Feferman advocates for recognizing mathematics as part of a broader open-ended domain instead of the reductive and mechanistic sense described by Nagel and others. Consequently, he ends up concurring with Godel over the issue of AI, claiming our first goal should be formulating a coherent, systematic account of how the mathematical mind works. AI is secondary and currently unapproachable.