Imagine Pot Was Legal. How Would You Brand It?
fastcompany.com
fastcompany.com
"Our marijuana is grown in the rolling hills of Upstate New York - a region which has a long history of quality agriculture. We guarantee that our pot, containing 3.5% THC by weight, will give you a smooth and pleasant high that is a hallmark of Femur brand marijuana."
Certainly there'd be big companies that were successful. Anyone that could put out a lot for cheap would be a big brand for sure, especially soon after legalization.
But as far as actual brand success-- where the brand itself helps the company-- there's no telling. The "counterculture" nature of the market makes any attempt at branding a shot in the dark. So a stay in school panda has a pretty good chance.
__
What an interesting world this would be...But we wouldn't care how interesting it would be because we'd be high? Right?
To inspire himself, he lit up a marijuana cigarette,
excellent Land-O-Smiles brand.
Of course, this was in an alternative universe where the Axis powers won World War II...I'd expect pre-rolled joints to be kept in small packages with large warning labels and sold from behind the counter, exactly like cigarettes. "Loose" pot would likely be sold the same way. Habitual smokers would just walk up and ask for their brand.
Like beer, there would be "grow-houses" analogous to breweries. You could go take a tour, order some <strike>bar food</strike> munchies, and your favorite designer strand. Casual, or "sophisticated" smokers would endlessly debate the various aspects of the high and experience.
I think the more important question, and the unique part, is what to do about the paraphernalia? I don't foresee Walmart carrying bongs anytime soon. There would likely be more head shops springing up, with few big, existing players opting to go for that market for image reasons. This may change over a longer period of time.
Somethings are better to remain/become a cottage industry.
This is one. While these prototypes would fit what I imagine the packaging a cottage industry cannabis operation would produce, if there were the impetus to move the product out of its current packaging, I shudder to think what the marketers for the likes of mass-produced/consumed beers would come up with.
Also, I imagine the cognitive dissonance of the anti-drug commercials, like the one with pot smokers hitting the child on a bike while pulling away from a drive-thru window contrasted with commercials touting the virtues and benefits of legal pot would be too much for some to handle.
So for these reasons, and others -
Decrim > Legal
Whenever I go grocery shopping, there are the mass-produced cheap beers, but there are also good imports and microbrews. The wine aisle has even greater variety. Why would weed be different?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tanqueray http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kahl%C3%BAa http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bacardi http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Captain_Morgan
"Got a little Cap'n in you?"
These are all off-the-top of my head examples of commercials I've seen on TV... maybe you meant broadcast vs cable television? Or are you outside of the US? (I assumed you were in the USA b/c of the no cigarette commercials comment... I think that's only in the US...)
If it were me I'd target the younger audience and use humor. Shoot for the energy drink audience who've gotten themselves so hyped up that they probably need it. Maybe use some of the footage from those old 50s films where everyone ends up dead at the end from pot use. Then follow it with a tag line like "Marijuana...It's not just for crazy people who jump out of windows anymore!"
I admit, I do love the back of the box in the article. There's some real mileage to be gotten out of "Alcohol is way more dangerous". But I can't see using that in the initial marketing since any decision to legalize would be preceded by a long debate that would certainly put those points in the public concious.
http://www.metafilter.com/72961/Harshing-your-mellow#2168021
Yeah, yeah, I know legalization advocates think that pot is likely to be grown primarily by local artisans and not by violent drug gangs, as it is currently, or commercial agriculture operations feeding into megabrands like all legal mind-altering substances. That is because legalization advocates have an enormous capacity for self-deception, quite possibly helped by the fact that they are stoned.
[1] http://steve-yegge.blogspot.com/2009/04/have-you-ever-legali...
Cross that bridge when you get to it ;-)
Also, you might want to open any issue of High Times. They advertise a million hemp and pot-related products, many of which could just as well be advertising pot itself.