I looked at it and wondered what was so special about it. Only when I read the comments did I suspect that I had been protected from some great evil by my browser.
You see, I use Firefox. Firefox removed <blink> support a while ago.
You see, I use Firefox. Firefox removed <blink> support a while ago.
This is why the word "html" also blinks on that page.
CSS animations are a more modern feature than <blink> tags, of course -- are you using an old version of Firefox?
I use Chrome, I like it better than Firefox, I also knew blink was deprecated in FF and had the same thought(would this work in firefox?) because I hadn't bothered to check if this was done using CSS or the <blink> tag. Although I didn't consider commenting on it.
Unless you're using a version of firefox older than 24 this is a pretty weird statement.
I did not actually check at that point that it had used <blink> but assumed. This was an error.
As it happens, I run Nightly and for whatever reason the animation is not functioning there. I presume it's faulty browser detection on their part or the lack of a prefix-free version or some such thing.
Sorry for being a dick; it just seemed like you were trying to make an anti-FF statement based on prior knowledge and nothing else, glad to hear it was just their nightly build not functioning properly.
For what it's worth, I prefer FF as a company, but I like Chrome for syncing tabs and the developer tools.
As a corollary, the AdWords management interface detects Nightly as an old browser rather than a very new browser.
animation: 1s steps(1, end) 0s normal none infinite blink;