That would be more analogous to Google correcting input for perceived spelling errors. Putting in garbage as a query isn't wrong, it has a well-defined answer for the vast majority of garbage.
And yet the commentor is claiming that the other tool is able to produce useful output from those inputs.
"correct" is not equivalent to "helpful"
The better part of this quote is the sentiment that follows;
I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question.
"Look at this! If I mash gibberish into a search engine it returns the same."