Ladonia: An Illegally Created Nation Where Creativity Rules
slate.com
slate.com
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Sudan#Independence_.28201...
a bunch of my friends on IRC were very keen on the idea, although I don't suspect they know what burden it would entail.
yes, we'd be able to set up our own privacy policies and, yes we can have super fast internet, lay our own fiber and infrastructure of that nature could be created.
however, agriculture, the bureaucratic hoops we'd have to jump through to successfully secede and the general hard work and labour that would have to go in, I believe, is unaccounted for.
this is a cool concept, and micronations are a nice idea, I just wish I could find a plot of land that's not owned, I'd definitely put a lot of hard work into getting out of my country.
The last time I priced it out (I was depressed about my choices) it was about $125K to get a fiber between my house and the nearest peering point (PAIX, which is slightly closer than MAE-West). That was about $10K per mile. Once you get there you need to find an IP transit provider to hook up with. Lots more choices than 'cable' or 'dsl' though :-)
That, and the inevitable descent into savagery: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord_of_the_Flies.
My understanding of secession has always been that one does not ask for permission. Requests to pay taxes, for example, would fall on deaf ears. Otherwise you've not seceded, you're just on vacation.
Although I wonder, what kinds of technologies would you need to achieve complete self-sufficiency? It's a practical question too because that's what we would need them to settle mars and the moon, not to mention other solar systems.
Perhaps you could get a lot done with robots, it depends on the task.
Is there some other quality I am missing that separates it from any other piece of property someone owns, creates a website for, and calls a micronation?
The most interesting part is the legal wrangling.
It's not private property - it was built with driftwood in a public nature preserve. The authorities wanted it gone, but first of all - it's natural driftwood - is that illegal? Well, it turned out to be. So the artist sold the sculpture itself to some uncontactable people outside of the country, and suddenly the municipality couldn't just order him to remove it, and so on and so forth. He then built another sculpture of cement with hundreds of numbered rocks, and sold each rock to a different person, in order to spread the "blame" further.
Eventually it got so popular it became a local tourist attraction. And so it still stands.
edit: Aside from that it's just a kooky artist doing kooky things. Lars Vilks in infamous in Sweden for his stunts. He's also been outspoken in free speech issues which has made him a target of Muslim fundamentalists.
The artist in question has also had lots of media attention for his work depicting Muhammed (the prophet): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lars_Vilks#Muhammad_drawings_c... The guy is a racist nutjob.
My impression is that he mainly trolls the art establishment. It's usually quite difficult to tell how serious he is. His book "Hur man blir samtidskonstnär på tre dagar: handbok med teori" ["How to become a contemporary artist in three days"] seems to seriously and carefully argue for George Dickie's institutional theory of art, while at the same time it is clearly taking the piss out of contemporary art projects...
The artists are simply fucking around.
Indeed, Sud Tirol is often cited as a good example of how to handle a linguistic/cultural minority, which mostly involves the aforementioned piles of money, and a lot of freedom to use their own language. In the Ladin speaking area, almost all the signs, for instance, are in Ladin/Italian/German. In the German speaking area, they're in German and Italian.
The whole secession would be somewhat more believable if the police protection of Vilks didn't costs the Swedish tax payers about a million USD per year.