Early screenshots of Twitter ('06), Facebook ('05), and Tumblr ('07)
imgur.com
imgur.com
Bingo Card Creator, circa early 2007: http://www.bingocardcreator.com/old-site/index.htm
It doesn't exactly scream "This will certainly sell a quarter million of software, allow you to quit your day job, and fund your software business."
You'd find similar things floating around if you were to look at the early history of most companies which are widely idolized in our space. Nobody ships perfection on day 1. Luckily, customers are happy to pay for imperfect things.
While glancing at the data though, it appears something must have shifted about 12 months ago and you're on track to make a lot less than you had up through 2012.
Though I agree I'm amazed at its success. It's one of those ideas I'd have dismissed as "you could never make money doing that."
Glad for you that your product has given you that freedom, but I don't think there are many devs who would be comfortable quitting a day job for circa $35K gross ARR...
Edit to say: I see from the link elsewhere that you publish your numbers (kudos), and that gross mean ARR for the last 4 years is $51K, which is a passive income I wouldn't say no to! Doesn't change my position on quitting the day job however.
Facebook: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Facebook&oldid=338...
Twitter: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Twitter&oldid=1074...
Tumblr: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tumblr&oldid=27832...
1. How's simple (one could say crude) these looked back in the day - yet that didn't prevent people from signing up.
2. How quickly things age online - it only takes a few years for your UI to look ancient.
Tip for startups: save! And get that DB right first time.
alias mkdir='git init' # or mkprj, mkp, mkdirp ... ?(although this might not be early enough and generally people shouldn't rely on archive.org caching their site.)
If you do a Google image search for 'skimfeed' you'll find screenshots for when it was written up on various sites. (although images might not be as ideal as HTML the screenshots might not include what you are looking for).