Facebook data scientists: A series of blog posts on love
facebook.com
facebook.com
I've always been suspicious of this type of measurement. It seems like statuses such as "I LOVE shoveling snow SO MUCH but I will be happy when winter is over!", where positive language is used to convey negative emotions through irony and contrast, would completely destroy such ratings. Maybe there are AIs that understand irony?
For client work, I personally prefer to look at the length, and extend of vocabulary (Zipf rank, excluding misspellings, argumentative keywords) of the comments, because it's not really positive vs. negative as much as useless (praises or attacks) vs. arguments (usable criticism vs. structured defense) that matters on the long run.
For relationship studies, I’d rather look into private messages and delay to respond (with, in Facebook case, a clear explanation that Scientist had no access to actual information, or even individual meta-data) than content.
I await further research predicting breakups, divorces, and stalker homicides.
They can, but I’m assuming (like the rest) it's neither very new (unanswered messages, asymmetric attention) or very positive, or reassuring: I remember a blog post detailing how older, more male profiles spent time on younger, more female profile a lot, especially through photos. On Valentine’s day, big corporation have a duty to smile.
On every other day of the week, the ethics of informing, or acting upon any of that seems murky at best.
http://tofesi.mimuw.edu.pl/~cogito/smarterpoland/facebook/si...
Arrows show flows between groups, times are average time spent between changes in that group.