Obama DOJ’s New Abuse of State-Secrets Privilege Revealed
firstlook.org
firstlook.org
> "could reasonably be expected to cause significant harm to national security."
Which on the face of it is true, because:
> The bogus national security claims invoked were even more outrageous because they were used to continue the persecution of someone the government knew to be innocent.
Exposing the truth makes us look bad. Making us look bad puts our bullshit, freedom harming programs at risk. We serve those programs, those programs are the most important thing (and not looking bad).
They don't care about you either unless you're large enough that losing your business would actually matter. They don't care about you at all if it's impossible to lose your business (i.e. employer-provided health insurance, cable companies).
This is a ridiculous claim.
What do you call voting?
The choice between "big government" and "big business" is a false dichotomy, if that's what you're getting at.
What is the third choice? Anarchy? What if I prefer not to be dragged out of my house and beaten to death by a mob?