Hacker News Reader

Comment by short_circut | Hacker News Reader

That is roughly what I thought when I saw this. These people are dealing with criminal enterprises. What do they expect?

View on HN

SR1 was a criminal enterprise as well, and there's no indication DPR was stealing from his users. Trust is at least as valuable in the criminal world as it is in legitimate enterprise, if not more so. A criminal who runs a trustworthy criminal enterprise is likelier to do well in the long run than one who rips off his customers.

  A criminal who runs a trustworthy criminal enterprise is likelier to do well 
  in the long run than one who rips off his customers.

Sure, yet it happens all of the time. Not everyone is logical and forward thinking, and sometimes they just want a big score.

did DPR do well in the long run?

DPR's failure was opsec, not trustworthiness. Dishonest criminals get caught due to poor opsec, too.

SR1 was a criminal enterprise as well, and there's no indication DPR was stealing from his users

That reminds me of arguing along the lines of, I played Russian Roulette before, and I didn't lose. Therefore, I will not lose this time either.

Allegedly, SR2 was setup in ways which made it much, much easier to run off with larger quantities of money than with SR1. Given the circumstances, you could reasonably conclude this would happen.

Running off with the money is probably the smart move. The quicker you can get off the radar with something like this, the better your chance of not ending up in jail. It is entirely possible they are made for life, and with no more incoming transactions, if they haven't left a trail, they can have their cake and eat it too.

You can easily throw that trust away and profit some bitcoins if your face is unknown. In the real world someone would come after you sooner or later. In the world SR1/SR2, Bitcoins and Tor? Only if the NSA has an interest.

But there was indications that DPR was murdering people who got in his way. Hardly an "ethical upcheck" here, and if he didn't steal from his users it was only because he didn't feel it necessary, not because he felt ethically bound for that.

In fact ensuring the ideal of SR paying out fairly would allow his business to grow and therefore his lack of theft could easily be entirely and completely pragmatic without needing a shred of ethics to support it.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com