Travel like a human (Airbnb, YC W09)
washingtonpost.com
washingtonpost.com
Were they accepted the first time they applied?
Still a fantastic idea, and would definitely look to be a guest when traveling on a budget.
While this could be painful in the short-term, it would help them achieve the ubiquity that they seem to want.
We didn't feel any obligation to hang out with the host, bring gifts or stay in touch, or to accommodate our host or anyone else at our home -- which made things a lot easier.
I think it's more correct to think of AirBnB as cheap hotel, not premium couchsurfing.
The UI is also nicer.
CS is fantastic, but it's not simply about free accommodation: to get the most out of it you need to put in quite a bit of effort too (which is as it should be).
Airbnb seems to be for people who don't really want to go that route.
Every time I hear about airbnb though, I wonder - don't you need a permit to offer paid accommodation? For example in my part of the U.S. you need a "special use" permit to run a B&B. How is advertising your spare room on airbnb different?
I looked in their FAQ but couldn't find an answer.
I don't think the collusion is necessarily overt, but most businesses welcome this kind of barrier to entry.
Granted there are also financial interests at stake, for example the state collecting a hefty room tax when people end up in hotels. But then that money goes to infrastructure among other things, so there is some method in the madness.
The entrenched businesses don't want any competition from this here new-fangled internets.