There are still plenty of places in the USA where you could be killed for being gay, the difference is not by the state but by individuals.
So we are not exactly a shining beacon ourselves.
There are still plenty of places in the USA where you could be killed for being gay, the difference is not by the state but by individuals.
So we are not exactly a shining beacon ourselves.
the difference is not by the state but by individuals.
And therein lies the distinction. We still have a long way to go, but our laws are structured and being structured in a way that protects those rights. Even though some states might be trying to push back the tide of tolerance, the momentum is seriously in the direction of equal rights. Every country has idiots and bigots, but when a state sponsors such bigotry, then the light should be shined on those wrongs. Our ignoble idiots exonerate actions of legislators and leaders in Russia.Google has been quite active in fighting for gay marriage within US, submitting amici briefs to the court cases, spending money on campaigns, and so forth...
"Since 1993 gay sex was made legal in Russia, in 12 US States gay sex is a crime."
"The supremacy of federal law over state law only applies if Congress is acting in pursuance of its constitutionally authorized powers."
Congress does not have an authority to govern sexual conduct. Just because enforcement of sodomy laws has been unpopular long before 2003, doesn't mean they don't exist.
Hint: The Supremacy Clause limits federal law; the product of the legislative branch. Lawrence v. Texas is court decision; the product of the judicial branch. That's like saying the second amendment requires the legalisation of marijuana because pot is a type of rifle. ><