Hacker News Reader

Comment by PavlovsCat | Hacker News Reader

Even assuming there would have been a valid reason for law enforcement to disrupt the communications of those individuals, how could an intelligence agency be justified in doing so?

View on HN

Try to remember the NSA is an intelligence agency, not a law enforcement agency. They're not interested in producing evidence and bringing anything to trial.* Rather, they're targeting anonymity and privacy in all forms since these oppose their core mission (Signals Intelligence (SIGINT) and Information Assurance (IA)... http://www.nsa.gov/about/mission/index.shtml).

* Though through inter-agency collaboration, they tip off other agencies when they have something...

I still don't see how disrupting the ability of individuals to communicate with each other does anything to undermine anonymity and privacy.

For this discussion's sake, there are two forms of communication: (1) The public forum you can meet up with new people and talk. (2) And the direct message sending kind like phones and emails. Though the NSA is actively monitoring both, here we're discussing the latter.

With that out of the way, they're targeting the former in-order to make it impossible for people to come together and organise privately and anonymously around subversive ideas.

The specifics of targeting IRC are probably tied to the efficiency of the protocol which allows very cheap hardware and minimal bandwidth to the extent that non-complying private foreigners may provide a free forum the government can't control.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com