Apple is no longer hungry, nor foolish.
Apple is no longer hungry, nor foolish.
You mean like the plastic Cube, G3, G4, Macbook and iPod's that preceded them during Jobs tenure? Only with even better and novel quality plastics used?
>and the iPad mini (both products Jobs had resisted)
Jobs probably knew about the mini all along, it takes more than a year to prototype and ship such a device. Besides, what jobs "resisted" or not is mere speculation, unless there are actual sources of him rejecting them. But even then, Jobs, according to witness accounts, changed ideas about lots of things he once rejected (e.g the iBooks).
>and the more damning fact that for the first time a dividend of a serious size was paid. Jobs was adamant about growing the warchest.
At a time when the warchest was still small. When Jobs died it rivalled the US economy. After some point it's silly to ammass even more money.
>His assumption was that if a stockholder thought his/her investment was better placed elsewhere, stock could be sold and reinvested. The act of paying a dividend states that the board thinks the investor can do better elsewhere with that money.
Only, whatever the board thinks, the invester CAN go elsewhere with that money, and that would have an effect on stock, morale etc. Better throw a bone and keep investors happy too.
"Apple is no longer hungry, nor foolish" is such a facile statement that means absolutely nothing.
And while an Icahn sized stock buy back is probably too much, their current buy back makes all the sense in the world. The stock is tremendously undervalued.
You can't say it more eloquently than Warren Buffet: "If you could buy dollar bills for 80 cents, it's a very good thing to do." [1]
[Disclosure: I am long AAPL.]
1: http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2013/03/04/apple-warren-buffett-...
I expect if all that money was in the US they would be spending it on something else. There are only so many fancy stores with expensive glass you can build overseas.
The iPad Mini actually sells really well, and Steve was around to ship the hundred iterations of iPod (nano, shuffle, etc.)
I knew Steve, I happen to agree, but de mortuis nil nisi bonum, as they say. :)
This may indicate a corporate shift from a visionary outlook to a managing perspective. Someone on the inside would have better insight, but as an outsider I have to wonder.
Or perhaps No?
There's a lot of plastic on a Mac. Look at the G3 desktop.