Hacker News Reader

And yet it's trivial to write a highly multithreaded application with STM in most CL implementations today.

If Clojure was less inclined to differentiate itself from other Lisps and co-opting the future of the language I believe there'd be far less zealotry on both sides of the fence. IMO Clojure is just fine. I don't see the reason why it needs to persist CL FUD in order to make its case. They're both very practical implementations of Lisp after all.

View on HN

FWIW, I've been in the Clojure community for a few years and see almost zero FUD about Common Lisp. The atmosphere in the Clojure community is much more about pragmatism than zealotry.

Mostly, I see a healthy respect for other Lisps and a recognition that learning from traditions is a good way to build good things for the future.

Being in the Clojure myself, I'd say the aforementioned "healthy respect" and "pragmatism" come from the fact that we all probably have migrated through at least a few languages before ending up at Clojure, which gives us a sense of perspective that keeps most of the zeal away.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com