I hate annotations in PHP. They feel very tacked-on. I'd much rather see actual enforced typing in the language.
This is a step in the right direction, but it doesn't go far enough, in my opinion.
This is a step in the right direction, but it doesn't go far enough, in my opinion.
Annotations. Namespaces. There is nothing in PHP that was not an afterthought. While it could technically be considered "unfair" to criticize the language in that respect, the total failure to push it in any rational direction in the last decade or two says nothing about the language, but speaks volumes about the people in charge of it.
PHP is a horrible, horrible failure. Not a failure in the sense that it doesn't work; it does. It does what it was and is intended to. But it does that in such an absolutely shitty way, and with such a grotesque mountain of horrid workarounds and terrible hacks that are sometimes called features, that there is no excuse for the way this language has evolved.
It works. And it's used all over the place. But that doesn't make it good. If the road to hell is paved with good intentions, then PHP is the express route.
Thank goodness there are people who have thicker skin than I, and release FOSS to the world despite comments like yours.
Then again I think some pop music is good, so I'm starting from a point where I don't necessarily think being popular makes something mediocre.
That said, I really hate being forced to write in PHP because of its complete inelegance, so much so that I have left all my legacy PHP in a burning garbage heap and ran screaming to Scala, where type safety is a given. But as I'm being forced to move back to PHP for a project because of a client's demands I'm trying to look at the silver lining of programming with it. Sometimes it takes some squinting but it is possible to appreciate what PHP has accomplished.
To use a car analogy, I have more respect for the guy running an old Mustang he tunes up and runs a 11 second quarter-mile than the jackass who drops 200 large on an exotic that pulls a 10.
The framework you are using may be emulating them, though.
This claim has no basis and the rest of your rant is a tautology. There's been no attempt to improve the language but all the improvements are afterthoughts?!? You can't have it both ways. I'm disappointed this post is grayed out and your post isn't.
The framework you are using may be emulating them, though. By parsing docblocks. Hence why it feels like that.
Would it not be better to catch the recoverable error that "function foo (integer $a)" gives, then use your error handler to check that $a is an integer?