Secret – Share anonymously with your friends. Speak freely
secret.ly
secret.ly
I always wonder why. Can't you just attach any retargeting/personalization/whatever to the logged-in account? There's no need to know exactly which device I'm using, aside maybe from model and OS version.
Is this the real reason you need device ids?
> Secret’s concept looks fairly simple at first: Based on the contacts in your mobile phonebook, you’re plugged into a network without establishing an identity or even a static username up front, and asked to share any and everything to that network. While initially you’re only communicating with friends, those secrets slowly trickle out to others depending on whether or not your friends have interacted with your posts.
I'm not sure what to think about this. It sounds more like your app is game of "guess who this secret belongs to". While this is interesting (especially for everyone in college and younger), I feel that you guys need to change your marketing to better reflect reality. of course I could be completely wrong since hn is no longer the demographic for this type of app
We appreciate the probing questions, as we want to be as clear as possible about what, why, and how we're building Secret.
Facebook and banks do that because they are built with everything but anonymity in their mind, while instead your primary objective as your slogan says is "Share anonymously with your friends. Speak freely."
You care not about real anonymity, you just care about selling the concept behind it, giving a false sense of safety, just to profit from that, riding on the wings of the need from IT uneducated people to protect themselves now that the alarmism is very high given to what we understood about NSA.
Or, is it just profit? Maybe it would be a smart move from NSA to affileate with enterprises creating such fakely anonymous services..
But really? I just guess it's all about profiting on the need for anonymity gone wrong.
What would be interesting is an application that does not log and keep track of the user's identity (this obviously does), one that runs on a similar "no-log" infrastructure, and whose code is open source and readily available for auditing.
Read about our stance on using address books here: https://medium.com/tech-talk/4791cf1fcf0e
Besides if they can't even have a website that are not tracking me and sharing my info with 3d parties (i.e. Google-analytics, Cloudfont, and Amazon Web Services), how could I ever trust their product/app?
This is satire of course, but for a brief moment it made me reverse my stance on the SF Google shuttles/rent price thing. And you know—sometimes behind satire there's the memory of someone who actually said something to that effect.
(If anyone actually has this question: feed a homeless person. Oh, I don't mean give food to a homeless person, I mean, cut a homeless person into thin slices and season it to your cat's taste. Dickens would recommend using the children of the homeless. Who ever said humans shouldn't be eaten? Disruption!)
Follow-up thoughts were:
- What percentage of users would simply take it as an opportunity to be anonymously nasty to each other?
- In larger sharing circles, would users take to using "tripcode" type images or signatures in their shares to actually fight anonymity.
- How do you actually monetize such a service? As a deeper source of sentiment? A window into the things people want/think, but won't demonstrate publicly?
- If sharing user produced text, how anonymous could it actually be? Speech patterns, capitalization, punctuation and whatnot is all very telling. It would be an interesting application of NLP to anonymize those tidbits without changing their meaning.
And i'll bet you most of the things shared are judgmental.
Does anyone know if it spams your address book?
The way it forms its 'secret' networks is similar to LinkedIn's degree system. Your phone contacts are your 'First Degree' connections, their contacts are your 'Second Degree' connections, etc.
Most posts from 2nd or 3rd tier connections never appear on your feed, it's only the popular ones that show up. It's interesting since you really have no idea who you're interacting with.
Disclaimer: I really have no idea how it all works, that's just my impression after a few hours of use.
Anonymity will be relative to how unique your behavior is among your address book contacts. Might become an awesome tool to educate people about the difficulty of anonymizing content...
Whisper is like PostSecret without the irony and users over the age of 22. Part of me wants to get all haughty and say there's no way they need 21M, and the other part wants to get all haughty and say they need 1B, because people will get all over this stuff for this faux-honest emo 2.0 is how people really feel behind the layers of irony and spectacle.
I cringed when corporations started adopting sarcasm and slang to fit in on Twitter and FB, but now I cringe when I see companies using this kitschy-intimate-bitchy-tumblr style.
(May totally be for you, of course, I'm not value judging here. Just... I am absolutely not the target market here, I think.)
Congratulations.
App looks great, and the idea is great. Good stuff.
This isnt how to make an anonymous secure network for sharing. It only obscufates it for those who are poor at tracking you or companies that mine your public data for sale - although technically that anonymous nature still doesnt work unless everyone uses the network. If your sister is still on a public social network and posts photos of you , or references to your job - you will still be mined.
So that said. Whats up?
That being said, we also have implemented a number of measures to prevent triangulation. For example, your friends' secrets will remain hidden until you have enough friends on the network. You can't just sign up with one contact, that won't work.