I even contemplated suicide about it. Of course people come rushing and tell you that you have a mental illness because no one in his right mind would think of killing himself for something that might as well not happened as no one took notice of it. But it is in my mind and I have to life with my mind.
Then again, centuries ago people raped and murdered and yet aspired to become great people. And some did. Certainly they never thought about ending their lifes merely because a million other people hoped they would die in a ditch.
I'm not sure which of your comments that 3rd3 was picking up on, but that's what 3rd3's comment seemed to say.
edit:
[0] slides if you're interested: https://speakerdeck.com/chewxy/underhanded-javascript-how-to...
The only real problem is when I'm programming or furthering my tech skills I feel like I'm short changing the social side. Same thing going the other direction. As I'm getting more comfortable with the tension between the two modes I'm feeling good about my potential as a consultant.
- I can't stop something I don't like about myself merely by being aware of it.
I have practically no chance of getting a job in software development or something similar.
I'm prone to being misquoted, which is probably worse than being misunderstood (I learnt I was prone to being misunderstood when I was about six).
I really enjoy hideous data structures.
I think Jeff Atwood has written about prospective employees not passing fizzbuzz. He also mentioned people who claimed to have 15 years experience in software development taking 15 minutes to make a solution.
#!/usr/bin/perl
#1390894695.273252
#07:38:15 28/01/2014
#fizzbuzz.pl
use warnings;
use strict;
my $i=1;
for( ; $i<=100; ++$i) {
if(!($i%3)) {
print "fizz";
}
if(!($i%5)) {
print "buzz";
}
if($i%3 and $i%5) {
print "$i";
}
print "\n";
}
I started learning perl a couple of days ago.There, if you have difficulties to express yourself, it's just a matter of interview training. I am sure you will do well.
In the past, I have been classed as dumb by many different people. The term "intelligence" is hard to define, especially these days with lumps of silicon and metal being used to predict the weather up to five days in advance and simulating nuclear detonations. Because of this it is very open to interpretation. The closest I've got to a reasonable definition is nicked off Greg Chaitin, a researcher in information theory:
Furnish an intelligence with a block of data, if the intelligence can compress the data, it has achieved some understanding of it.
When it comes to writing basic programs, I'm most experienced in C. Something simple can easily turn into 600 lines of drunk double dutch.> There, if you have difficulties to express yourself, it's just a matter of interview training. I am sure you will do well.
Unfortunately, I hardly ever get interviews. I have trouble getting a minimum wage job. The last interview I attended I mentioned writing a C program to determine the positive square root of two to fifteen decimal places without resorting to the standard library. As soon as I started trying to explain how it worked (just successive approximations then squaring the answer to check it), I think I blew their fuses.
Don't be hard on yourself, Sir James Dyson's invention of the bagless vacuum cleaner sucked loads, yet he's made millions.