How Inactivity Changes the Brain
well.blogs.nytimes.com
well.blogs.nytimes.com
Abstract:
Increased activity of the sympathetic nervous system is thought to play a role in the development and progression of cardiovascular disease. Recent work has shown that physical inactivity versus activity alters neuronal structure in brain regions associated with cardiovascular regulation. Our physiological studies suggest that neurons in the rostral ventrolateral medulla (RVLM) are more responsive to excitation in sedentary versus physically active animals. We hypothesized that enhanced functional responses in the RVLM may be due, in part, to changes in the structure of RVLM neurons that control sympathetic activity. We used retrograde tracing and immunohistochemistry for tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) to identify bulbospinal catecholaminergic (C1) neurons in sedentary and active rats after chronic voluntary wheel-running exercise. We then digitally reconstructed their cell bodies and dendrites at different rostrocaudal levels. The dendritic arbors of spinally projecting TH neurons from sedentary rats were more branched than those of physically active rats (P < 0.05). In sedentary rats, dendritic branching was greater in more rostral versus more caudal bulbospinal C1 neurons, whereas, in physically active rats, dendritic branching was consistent throughout the RVLM. In contrast, cell body size and the number of primary dendrites did not differ between active and inactive animals. We suggest that these structural changes provide an anatomical underpinning for the functional differences observed in our in vivo studies. These inactivity-related structural and functional changes may enhance the overall sensitivity of RVLM neurons to excitatory stimuli and contribute to an increased risk of cardiovascular disease in sedentary individuals. J. Comp. Neurol. 522:499–513, 2014. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Does this mean that the experiment was done in simulation?
* I have no idea how accurate that technique or my description of it is, but in general that is what happens. We got a model of something, we record set of measurements, and then we compute what internal state the model needs to be in for us to observe that set of measurements.
Shameless plug, but one that's probably highly relevant to this demographic:
My current project is desktop alerts to remind people to be more active at work: stretches, activity tips, etc. to de-stress the back, neck, wrist, improve circulation, reduce blood sugar, etc.
Indicate your interest at motionandcompany.com.
Stay healthy, my friends!
Otherwise I get it, but couldn't I just set a timer using the multitude of timer apps (or a physical timer) to do the same thing?
Right now, it's email-based, which is pretty terrible. Way more intrusive than I'd like.
Eventually, I want to pair it with a physical desktop hardware companion to close the feedback loop and really integrate it deeper into office culture. Wellness programs right now are a joke because 1) they lack feedback to prove effectiveness and 2) exercising after work does not fix the damage of sitting all day.
That was Michelle Obama's photo-bomb on the Miami Heat from earlier this week. I think she was trying to convey the same thing I'm trying to convey: there's no shame in moving around and stretching in the office, although it might look a little weird to others.
[1] http://www.workrave.org/ [2] http://www.dejal.com/timeout/
We know we feel better, look better and are more focused when we Exercise
Until exercise becomes an addiction.It's not like this is an essential piece of information you cannot Google to find elsewhere.