Hacker News Reader

> every object is a member of the empty interface

There are no objects in Go, given that Go is not an object-oriented language... oops! (pun intended)

The word "object" predates OOP. I think the original meaning roughly equates to what we call a value today.

In OOP languages the objects contain the subroutines (methods) hence orienting the programming towards the objects.

Do the more pedantically inclined have a better definition?

What requirements does an object have to fulfill in your opinion?