Have I tattooed a syntax error on my arm?
stackoverflow.com
stackoverflow.com
My kids can't believe what we used to wear when I was their age. (It makes me laugh, too.) I look around at every garage sale and see $5 items that used to be considered quite elegant. I think of the hairstyles, room styles, humor styles, political causes, hobbies, relationships, and so much more that have flowed past like a river and disappeared around the bend.
Thank goodness, I'm not stuck today having to continue making any fashion statements I might have chosen years ago.
I tell my kids that I don't care if they get tattoos as long as they are the temporary kind. Maybe adults should switch to temporary tattoos, too. Treat them like any other form of fashion statement: make the statement you want when and where you want, then change when you want something else (and later you probably will want something else.)
I think this misses the mark for two reasons. One is simply that these sort of questions aren't really the point of SO, but I guess people disagree.
A bigger one is that closing is no big deal. People can still read the question and vote on answers! The only thing you can't do is add new answers. And given that there's already a perfectly good answer along with a bunch of other posts, more answers would just be adding to the noise.
Seems like a win-win to me, but others somehow construe this as the downfall of StackOverflow.
Why is a Question asking about syntax of whitespace in bash not suitable for stack overflow?
There's a worse problem on English stack exchange where people will say that your question has been answered even though none of the words you used are in any of their suggestions. This not only hurts searchability of questions and answers, but fails to recognise that many people using the site have English as a second language.
People come to StackOverflow because it has a good signal-to-noise ratio. Maintaining this ratio, and the reputation of the site as a resource rather than a discussion board is important.
I personally jump to StackOverflow results on Google pages because they almost always solve my problem exactly. If the results start being polluted by a bunch of less relevant discussions--which, being popular, are likely to rank well--I would probably stop using SO results as much.
On top of this, just leaving a question like this open hurts the question itself as well. There is no reason to want 100 different answers all pointing out the missing space in different words! That way lies madness and Quora--where many answers to popular "survey" questions only get read because of the follow feature and a Facebook-esque machine-learning-based feed.
"Welcome, Redditors! We're looking for answers that provide serious, practical solutions to the problem stated. If you'd prefer to post a joke or launch a tangential discussion, please do so on the corresponding Reddit thread."
Why is that not a suitable question?
I'm just perplexed by the trend over all, especially with Wikipedia, for people to act like the internet is a library and shelf space is running out. Why would a site owner limit their user's contributions in any way except to conform to the law, and prevent trolling, spam, etc? Who knows how much value the next answer might have provided readers if they hadn't closed it down?
This is not to say SO or Wikipedia has the balance right; but it's a sensible reason to "limit their users' contributions."
http://hanzismatter.blogspot.com/
which implies that about 99% of westerners walking around with Kanji tattoos either have gibberish font (hilarious, read up about it) or think they have some girls name but its actually "weeds / brush (vegetation) / wild grassland"
The concept that you'll look better with a foreign language phrase as part of your skin is weird / mildly amusing all by itself, but the really funny part is the execution is so often an epic fail. So you've got an illiterate foreign language on your skin, not just a foreign language.
Given the apparently extreme popularity of the above genre, ridiculous source code should fit right in.
The uniqueness bit is somewhat ironic, considering it's the thing that a large part of your peer group is rushing to do, as well.
I'm just barely young enough that I'm considered somewhat rebellious for not having tattoos or piercings. From what I've seen of the general public, the peer pressure on younger people must be immense to get tattoos / pierced.
Ha. I love it!
"No tattoos or piercings? What are you, one of those straight-edge weirdos?"
"No, I'm just like, you know, a normal person."
It said "tig" in a sort of Chinesey looking font.
Is there any cultural significance to it? Does anyone have any good hacker tattoo stories?
Which begs the questions: which snippet is important/timeless enough to use and, of course, which language. As the OP found out the hard way one should use a Lang where whitespace doesn't matter.
Ideas?
Here is my own one:
grep life /dev/urandom | strings
The search for life continues.
It's also a "useless use of cat"! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat_(Unix)#Useless_use_of_cat
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat_%28Unix%29#Benefits_of_usi...
Go ahead and edit it then :)
This is why StackExchange sites will die.
Or perhaps they're just being subtle:
"This question was caused by a problem that can no longer be reproduced or a simple typographical error...."
One wonders how they deal with the situation of their own joyfulness, because it too should obviously be killed, but in order to do that they'd have to unhold joyful and interesting questions, creating joy which itself necessitates killing, and so on. Fork bomb.
One of my favourites was "Most astonishing violation of the principle of least astonishment", and the answers were a catalogue of how-not-to-build-software. Examples of good behaviour are nice, but counter-examples are often just as informative. Alas, it was "not a good fit for a QA"
Wrong, StackOverflow. I'm logged in with a years-old and couple thousand rep account so I kind of know the rules, and no HN is not Reddit thank you very much.
I figured it was going to be a forever loop or something...
A non-terminating loop will simply drag on forever, stealing cycles whenever it gets the chance.
2) it is fairly easy to kill an infinite loop. Killing the explosion of processes that a fork bomb creates is a different thing. Between the time that you detect the process ID of a process to kill and the time you kill it, that process may have spawned a few new processes.
More info at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fork_bomb#Defusing
A curious analogy for being alive...
Fork bomb, albeit could be somewhat symbolic of real life, just doesn't seem to have any clear meaning - so obscure that they even got the syntax wrong.
Disclaimer: I'm pessimist.
IANAD, but if you tried to (gently) stretch the skin where you need the space (like with some tape and sticks) then over a period of months you'd grow some new skin in between. You don't want to stretch the skin too much too quickly, or you'll get stretch marks (like some pregnant mothers do).