Your definition of can is different from most people are thinking. Usually people don't say can on illegal stuffs.
If you really think you can do something illegal because just you're able to do that, oops…!
If you really think you can do something illegal because just you're able to do that, oops…!
Please provide reasoning why you think it's "illegal." Otherwise, you're just spreading FUD, which is the whole reason for people believing a Linux distribution can't ship ZFS on Linux in the first place.
http://zfsonlinux.org/faq.html#WhatAboutTheLicensingIssue makes some funny claims about "same binary". GPL is not about "same binary" at all.