Of course, you can do whatever you want, but that doesn't mean that the rest of us won't probably look at your comments thinking "Here come the generics whiners again" and look in the other direction. You are alienating your audience with your indiscriminate repetition.
And, if the disclaimer helps you, I'd like generics in Go, they are useful sometimes. I just don't see the point in such zealotry over something which is merely convenient.
But seriously, they may not implement generics out of spite or just to troll generics zealots.
Edit: remove ambiguity
now my code looks like "func map(x []T, f func(T) T)" and everybody's happy :)
type T1 generic type T2 generic
func Map(f func(T1) T2, s []T1) []T2
I can see that I am putting some people off with my commentary, but other people apparently got new information. Hard to say whether this is a win or loss on net. Time will tell, sooner or later.