Microsoft Exchange Is MIT’s New Email System
tech.mit.edu
tech.mit.edu
For better or for worse, the world has come to expect integrated email and calendaring. I'm running Zimbra (community edition) for a few clients, and they like it, but alternatives to Exchange, even a good protocol, seem scarce.
KDE's Kontact looked promising for a while, but appears abandoned.
And I'm building a better calendar.
The problem is all the home-grown stuff is inevitably pretty low-level compared to today's solutions. Sure, there are plenty of hackers around to build OSS replacements for all our needs, but these hackers are students and professors: their main job is to do research, not implement enterprise software.
So I think the decision to move to outlook was probably based on the simple fact that it offers a lot of nice features that we don't currently have.
so sure, a few MIT students could "roll their own" in 12-18+ months. It likely still won't be as feature complete nor user friendly, and they spent 25% of their university time re-inventing the wheel.
There's one "but" - you have to go MS all the way. You cannot use those features without windows and their web ui is a complete disaster. That's one of the reasons it should never be used at any technical university IMHO. As soon as you touch anything MS, you're in the area where standards don't apply.
Between Thunderbird and a Blackberry I only really dip into Exchange to set new filters anymore.
I'm currently using Zimbra, and it is good enough, but it just isn't as nice. And "good enough" isn't really good enough. Whoever wants to topple Exchange is going to have to do better than this "me too" crap.
How about actually integrating the contacts, tasks, schedules, and email in some intelligent way?
I wonder if they considered IMAP + CalDAV with Thunderbird + Lightning or Mail + iCal on the client.
Does anyone detect a pattern?
(for the uninitiated; read the "Internet Mail" chapter of Unix Hater's Handbook for MIT admins struggling with Sendmail, circa 1990 ;-)
The opaque mail-store was a good idea when performance was an issue for mail servers - nowadays it just gets in the way constantly, especially when something breaks. The ACL system has been ridiculously broken for as long as I can remember. You can assign pretty much every letter of the alphabet to a mailbox/user but, for example, you cannot give a user delete permission on a folders content without giving him delete permission to the folder itself. Some ACL flags tend to interact funny with each other and nevermind trying to have users alter permissions (e.g. share folders) through their IMAP client...
This is just the tip of the iceberg, I'm honestly surprised someone was still using this dinosaur in production. ;-)
That said, moving to Exchange is truly a shame for a tech university. I haven't looked at zimbra and the ilk for a while. Are they still so bad?
Did everybody abandon progress? Did we outsource it to China?
Why is exchange needed at all?