Medium is Winning
m50d.github.io
m50d.github.io
People who show no hesitation in throwing a wall of text at other people show how much they really care about the reader's time.
Not everyone writes with you in mind as their ideal reader. Some people write for themselves and publish to keep themselves honest, though I don't presume to know what OP's motives and goals are in this case.
People exist with visual disabilities and giant walls of text in layouts such as yours might as well be a magic eye puzzle.
Yes, you like it and can do what you want, but you're throwing sand in the eyes of people you want to read your stuff.
Visual disabilities are an argument for having a font size consistent with the rest of the web and a site where browser zoom works, not for making your text larger than the rest of the web.
Zoomed in by two increments (125%), the font size and margins of the article become reasonably close to the Medium gold standard. Hopefully this may help you finish reading the article.</mildsarcasm>
Typography matters.
I found that kind of stuff offputting. It was one of the things I really noticed when thinking about why I preferred to read on Medium: there are a few social things at the end and those very subtle comment things, but for most of the time while one's reading it really is 2/3 blank white. (I sometimes use clearly to make medium wider - didn't want to complicate the post by mentioning that).
> The aversion to criticism you've shown in this thread makes me think I won't want to see anything else from you, so maybe it's for the better in your case.
Sorry to hear that. I was pleasantly surprised the post made the front page, pleased to see 7 comments... and then it turned out none of them were engaging with my words, they were all just complaining about the presentation (and worse, they're all the same complaints, and ones I've seen before. I don't know what I'm supposed to do about this (given that I'm happy with the design and disagree with those complaints) - I doubt people would read a FAQ).
Which I guess is what I get for writing a post on the subject of presentation, but it was still pretty disappointing.
header h1 { margin-bottom:3px; margin-top:3px; }
nav a { padding-top: 10px; padding-bottom: 10px; padding-right: 10px; }
h1 a { text-decoration:none; color:black; }
h1 a:hover { font-weight:bold; font-size:105%; text-decoration:underline; }
body { padding:20px; font-size:120%; }
p, li { max-width:800px; }
li { margin-bottom:6px; }
small { font-size:75%; }
> Hey, thanks! I didn't write the css, and I can't change it, but I appreciate you trying to help :)
Using a long-forgotten element to disable line breaking is pointlessly painful, but isn't as bad as some people get when they think every text processing tool runs javascript. The author sounded clued-in enough to know CSS, I don't know why he would think that doing it all in javascript isn't strictly worse.
I'd like to have your opinion on Theneeds [1]. It can't be compared to Medium as we're not for blogging, but we do a lot of personalization/recommendation.
At signup you select your interests and we build personalized streams of curated content mixed with user generated one. Then, we learn from your activity to get smarted about what really matters to you.
Moreover, we have a newsletter (default daily, but you can change the frequency) where we recommend you 8 news across your interests.
I guess you mean for Windows 8? Which market are you in? As the app is only available in the US + a few others (eng speaking).
Although I do think Medium is doing a great job of letting you discover some good reading material, I often find it a bit confusing too.
Not too long I co-created http://thetechblock.com out of similar frustration of not being able to find good tech-related articles. Reddit often doesn't show the stuff we find, Techmeme is very Silicon Valley oriented and HN can get a bit noisy. Feel free to let me know what you guys think.
Prismatic[0] comes to mind.