Snapchat Says Sorry for Data Breach, Updates Apps With Find Friends Opt-Out
techcrunch.com
techcrunch.com
I accept an apology.
They are using the word sorry in the "we are sympathetic" sense, not the apology sense.
Sorry you feel that way. Sorry your kid got sick. Sorry your car got broken into. The classic non-apology apology.
To clarify: the only way your phone number would be known by Snapchat and thus could have been leaked is if you provided it to Snapchat manually, correct?
edit - To answer your question: to his shareholders and employees holding options, because it was the right decision from a CAGR perspective.
edit 2 - if they get acquired 2 years down the line for $5B, it will still just be a CAGR of less than 30% from the FB offer. It's OT though, so I'll leave the post up to collect my downvote punishment.
However Facebook making such an offer is just nuts. What are they buying? 90% or more of the snapchat user base is on Facebook. Why dont they make their own? Make a seperate app, make a new brand and push it on fb.
It worked out as you would expect.
Expressing sympathy (which is generally considered distinct) also has an impact, although that can be less surprising.
Explanations generally consider the preference for a consistent world-view — think “We now all agree it was Brad’s fault, let’s now move on” above scape-goating.
In this case, an apology would mean: users were not wrong to trust a well-known app with their personal information, security professionals who warned the company about the breach were not wrong to follow white-hat protocol; the company should have acted on it. It's not clear in this case that ‘sorry’ is an apology, as much as a show of sympathy. As I wrote in a previous comment, I haven’t seen a single user complain about negative effect (or read much on teenager-oriented platforms) so I doubt the sympathy actually is towards typical users; on the other hand, the head-wrangling on Hackers News, and late apology, seem to point at a real concern among security professionals who see standard lowered. I would assume the largest issue is to have the indifferent callousness of Snapchat management contaminate the tech industry, and its perception by the main public; I would actually relate that to the lack of outrage at Snowden’s revelation, and a couple more recent news on privacy: “Our personal information is violated, stolen? Whatever…” Snapchat would make ‘Silicon Valley’ part of that line. Admitting that this is unacceptable would help regain the general perception that personal information needs to be handled with care, generally is and that large brands can be trusted to protect it (be it from black-hats or unwarranted government officials) — yet again, I'm not sure we can read this in SnapChat’s message.