What an insulting way to conclude an article.
"If you lack the vision to agree with me about Bitcoin, maybe you're old and terrible at your job."
What an insulting way to conclude an article.
"If you lack the vision to agree with me about Bitcoin, maybe you're old and terrible at your job."
The gist of it, if I remember it right, is that all transactions are authenticated by an interstellar 2-phase commit handshake. The distances involved keep the value of the currency stable, because transactions can take decades to process, and the direction of the signal is actually used as a form of authentication, to guard against (literal) MITM attacks. The goal of slow money was to have a currency that was stable enough to finance multi-century interstellar colonization projects.
As we watch out for fallacies, we need to be careful not to invoke the fallacy fallacy :)