France's Data Protection agency issues their maximum monetary penalty to Google
cnil.fr
cnil.fr
Better would be to fine any public company a percentage of their market cap or something comparative that matches the fine to the size of the company.
That would provide a true penalty that discourages large multi-nationals from abusing local laws.
I agree (and I'm pretty sure the CNIL agrees) it's not enough.
If the fines are this small, it's pretty clear that the legislators who passed this law were not interested in creating a serious deterrent.
An even more useless measure against Google was made earlier last year (2013) by the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) in the UK (a data privacy body).
Google, having wrongly collected wi-fi data during its Street View activities, was asked to delete the private data it had collected. It failed to do so, prompting the ICO to give them additional days to comply with deletion but no fine. [1]
Google probably have an entire department of corporate lawyers zealously protecting their interests, yet despite being instructed by an official body to delete private data, they "accidentally" retained the discs containing the additional private data. These are not the actions of a compnay that takes privacy seriously. And that is unlikely to change until official authorities sufficiently hold Google to account for their privacy transgressions.
The income from the local market comes to mind, as this is realistically the piece of the cake that the local government has some control over.
As a French, I see the CNIL as some kind of Superman of the citizens rights. When Superman fight against someone, this someone is probably evil.
It's cleared the European Parliament and is currently being stymied in the Council (the body made up of ministers from EU member states)
CNIL doesn't even deny that the new policy was a good thing but they levied a fine anyway!
What? Our constitution already protects our rights to freely sign legal contracts between each others. Since when is that a libertarian thing? TIL.
> Many people like to live in a democracy where money is not the only form of power, but where votes are powerful too.
Who's talking about money? People are already free to accept or not their contract with Google. What you want is allow people to vote for other people to be forbidden to sign a contract of _their_ choice with Google, you want people to vote to restrain other's freedom. That's the opposite of freedom and what our constitution is about.
Spammers all around the world are evil. They misuse data. The CNIL should fight them. Governments are evil. They collect and misuse data. The CNIL should protect us.
But the CNIL doesn't. It just wastes public money. They go after Google because it's so easy. The government needs a get-rich-fast scheme: CNIL sues Google.
They're not here to make things better or protect us. They just "do their job" but they do it in the most stupid way.
This sort of thing is done with speeding fines in several countries (link: http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/295905?tp=1)
What do you think Google's claimed revenue/profit in France would be, in that case?