This is a terrible way to associate with and think about people.
There is another rampant addiction going around, phycological dependance on the feeling of smug satisfaction in one's own superiority given by partaking in – and to a larger degree talking about – the latest fad in ( health | diet | environment | programming language | life ).
In total I went 8 weeks without any sugar. I have no plans to ever return to incorporating it into my diet. I consider this move to be one of the best things I've done since removing nicotine and alcohol completely from my life.
You are limited to essentially 20g of carbs a day total. This is enough to get a healthy dose of vegetables (not fruit of any kind - leafy greens) and that is about it. Maybe a dollup of sriracha.
Either way, after being on the diet for a couple months I had one bite of a chocolate bar and let me tell you, the flavor was 1000x more intense and I felt no need for more after the first bite.
Of course this is one person's experience, YMMV.
Sustained low carb is a bad idea. You are mimicking the metabolism of starvation. For the most part you want to be operating with glycogen topped up.
Really? Because I feel a heck of a lot less hungry, and sometimes need to remind myself that it's past time to eat breakfast or lunch.
sources: the art and science of low carb living, wheat belly
We did consume rye bread, but that was made ourselves and used only the amount of sugar needed to activate the yeast.
After 8 weeks I have returned fruit into my diet, but always whole.
The point I was trying to make on the root comment in this, was that simply going cold turkey on sugar, in my case, wasn't hassle free because of the headaches, but it was worth it.
It's a thorny issue.
We primarily only buy fresh vegetables. Lots of cabbage, spinach, lettuce, mushrooms, onions, peppers, asparagus).
It's better to err on the side you're on, because that justification covers quite a lot of ground. For instance, it's hard to find tomato without sugar in prepared food. Or anything else without sugar, actually.
Seems that food companies are afraid of "tasting bad" and just throw sugar in there willy-nilly, with the consequences now in plain sight, to say the least.
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2013/10/01/dining/nacho-g...
You could probably argue convincingly that sugar and doritos are actually more compelling to the public, because they are specifically engineered to defeat our body's natural mechanisms for regulating diet.
If you entertain the idea that some but not all people have a susceptibility to fructose addiction and then consider that a very large portion of the food supply is 'supplemented' with sugar you can begin to imagine just one of the reasons why obesity has been on such a rise.