Poll: Star Wars or Star Trek?
What's your poison?
And this is annoying because Star Trek could be "what would the future be like?". They just have rubbish writers. Let me give you an example, the shields failing is a plot device, the ship is in danger, but it doesn't have to take any damage that would prevent the state of the universe being reset at the end of the episode. But in Enterprise, the writers were too lazy and stupid to come up with something new, so they did exactly the same thing with "hull polarization". Drop these writers onto a show about a present-day warship and they'd be stuffed. Whereas BSG's writers would take it in their stride.
The hallmark of real grown-up scifi is that state is maintained between episodes.
It’s not as focused on the political elements as BSG is but I’d argue that Voyager in particular was a precursor to that more mature form of sci-fi.
To give an example I remember one particular episode of Voyager where they passed through a section of space inhabited by a species that had banned anyone with telepathic abilities. Though there was an action component to the episode the real interesting part came when discussing the rationale behind that society’s decision and the impact it had on those forced to carry out those order. That type of scenario is where Star Trek really shines.
Patrick Stewart might just be my favorite actor. Even with no props or a set, the man could still deliver a riveting performance.
You have seen nothing.
Hm, I just looked at Wikipedia. Didn't realize TNG went back as far as '87, I didn't become a fan till the 90s.
Trek is a series of standalone 42-minute episodes written by different authors with different agendas. Wars is one man's vision and after the first movie Lucas had all the time and money required for the rest. So it's natural to think of Wars as a better "whole" than Trek.
But in both cases I find myself wishing the vision and writing had been better. Does anybody over the age of 5 think Jar-Jar Binks was a good idea well-executed? No, he was just a plot device. Trek's Wesley Crusher is equally grating in most of his episodes. ("Wesley" is not to be confused with the talented Wil Wheaton, who deserved a better character.)
But when I watch Babylon 5 or Battlestar Galactica, well, I don't think the writing is bad or the characters contrived. Better vision, better writing, better stories.
I doubt I am alone.
And lest I come across too "normal" - I like books much, much more. My allegiance is to the Culture, not the fucking Federation.