How Spotify builds products [pdf]
dl.dropboxusercontent.com
dl.dropboxusercontent.com
In general, there is no good concept of a music collection (despite the UI having words "Collection" and "Library" in it). While you don't own albums in Spotify, I still sorely miss that concept. Starring entire albums makes for a fairly useless/unwieldy Starred playlist, so that's a no go. I've resorted to starring single songs, then later selecting a song from the starred list and then switching to playing the whole album (if I starred the first track of the album, I have to select another album track, then back to first track, to make it play the album and not just continue on the Starred playlist).
Basically, where's my damn list of Artists and Albums I've liked? In iTunes (or mp3 folders back in the day), I would scan the list of artists and select an album to play.
No, I do not want to have an all songs/genre playlist and then sort by artist and then page thru pages of tracks.
The mobile app has poor information architecture. Going back to the starred playlist (or any other playlist) takes 6 taps if I'm on the info screen.
Oh, I freaking hate the mobile info screen. To me, it always feels awkward to hit the song name at the bottom to bring up the "now playing" screen, then tapping "i" to show the info screen, just to select the album or the artist of the song I'm listening to. As far as I can tell, the whole point of the "i" button is to allow me to see the album art--but, bizarrely, seeing album art is the default (so always requires an extra tap to do anything related to artist or album).
Basically, it's a damn tapfest. It's frustrating when you want to switch songs or do some navigation quickly--for example, while in the gym on an elliptical or while running.
Also, there is no search history and the app is forgetful. Periodically, at unknown intervals, the mobile app forgets the album/song I was playing, and I have to re-enter a long artist name all over again. Not to mention there is no fuzzy search. Yeah, try spelling "Irresistible Force" correctly, quickly.
There are the things that make Spotify merely a very convenient music discovery service, as opposed to a complete, fulfilling replacement to owning your own music library.
Finally, there is general bugs, like crashing and streaming getting stuck now and again, which can be very frustrating in the middle of an album (the next song streams, this song is stuck).
Actually, in this regard, I think Spotify discovered the post-physical-media world: An artist's latest album is just a playlist they put together with some artwork. So obviously simple.
What I really want from Spotify (or any other music service) is the ability to have a playlist of albums, not a play list of tracks. Spotify has no concept of an album as a single entity, so I end up using the service in spite of this. This might be down to how I listen to music, but I'd guess that my album-centric view of music isn't particularly unique.
You can't sort playlists except manually, and clicking on your library gives you only a list of individual tracks and albums, completely ignoring playlists.
They have screwed this up in virtually every way possible.
I agree with the parent, Spotify's playlist-oriented design is a major UI problem.
I feel OPs pain, which is why I'm slowly working on a project that would make Spotify more useful for how I listen to music: better search, more detailed song / album / artist info...granted it'll just be a web app but it can be a real chore sometimes to use the mobile app for searching and browsing (see just about any Classical or Jazz for an example).
* The saved songs page is an unsortable, unfilterable static HTML page.
* The saved albums page doesn't cache any album art, and going to an album page doesn't display any album art. Again, no filtering.
* The saved artists page also doesn't cache artist images or allow for filtering.
The beta's been going on for two months and so far there has been no patch notes, no updates, and basically no communication with testers.
For me it usually takes two or three attempts for it to realise that it is online ( 'Discover is not available offline' ) and then occasionally it ceases to respond to UI input but keeps playing music.
Another favourite is to load a band's page with their name but no tracks.
But I keep paying them because when the service works it is excellent. It's just infuriating that it takes 10 minutes from making a decision to actually playing music, due to their buggy app.
* Totally inconsistent design - I think they are now rolling out a complete redesign to address this
* The current website was absolutely clueless of states when first released (i.e. showing signup buttons for logged in users)
* HTML views in the app shows/loads incorrect data
...and the list goes on. I started using Spotify when it was still invite-only in Northern Europe and converted into paying customer when the Android app came out (2009 fall I think?) but switched to Rdio recently due to all the problems with the service. The underlying streaming tech is rock solid but everything else seemed to go down hill release after a release.
I think the website keeps urging me to upgrade to premium when I'm logged in, even though I've had premium for years...
* iPhone app gives way too little feedback when it becomes unresponsive. I'm never sure if I should click again, wait, try another song etc. Why not add some "gathering data, please wait..", "Low bandwidth/reception.." or similar
* iPhone audio cues are hard to differentiate between. Why not make them less similar? When I click the headphone button I'm not sure if that sound meant that I paused, or skipped to the next song. It's like trying to learn morse code
* iPad interface. I don't have anything constructive to say about this, but it's just confusing and hard to use for me, and inconsistent with the iPhone.
And while I applaud their attempts at a native wrapper around HTML5, you can hardly claim that Rdio has "nailed it" with regards to their native app. It's a whole different product.
The HTML5 bit was my aside, given that one of the comments to thenmar was with regards to it's user-interface. And I suppose I should have been more specific and referenced the Mac desktop app, not the mobile client.
They also used to have a horrific splash webpage with autoplay IIRC, but thankfully they seem to have changed that.
Maybe there is some obvious way to fix all of this such as by reinstalling the Android app (did that about half a year ago I guess) or googling (though I've been mostly dissapointed when googling issues, ending up at the Spotify communit/support forum and basically finding out "yeah that's not possible/you have to do this tedious work-around"), but I mostly wrote this because I saw the opportunity to vent, so...
EDIT: Also, when I first wanted to use the browser version, the actual webpage/URL for the player was so hard to find it was almost as if they tried to make it a secret on purpose. But I'm happy that there even is a browser player in addition to the desktop app. And the Linux version of the Desktop app is very good (on Ubuntu at least) so I don't need to use Wine.
Compared to Spotify, what I like better about Google Music:
1. Much better Android client (faster, better UI) 2. Collection and My Albums features 3. Can quickly make a playlist from a radio station based on a song (which can be downloaded to my mobile phone) 4. Can upload music I own that is not in the catalog 5. Lots of top / key albums by Genre and Sub-genre - have found lots of new music since switching. 6. No facebook activity stream
What I miss from Spotify: 1. Having a desktop client (though don't miss as much as I thought I would) 2. Some music missing (only 2 artist so far, and I own the albums so I guess its only kind-of an issue)
[1]:http://community.spotify.com/t5/Spotify-Ideas/Please-restore...
I especially remember the nerds I grew up with at the height of the Ripping Era of music, where we all had our own way to organize everything. I was always flabbergasted at folks like my roommate in college that just had every song in a big "Music" folder and then had the tracks arranged just so in Winamp, hehe.
In the iPhone app you cannot read the whole track name, so Imagine finding a certain piece when all you see is:
Felix Mendelssohn: Violin Conc...
Felix Mendelssohn: Violin Conc...
Felix Mendelssohn: Violin Conc...
Felix Mendelssohn: Violin Conc...
Felix Mendelssohn: Violin Conc...
Felix Mendelssohn: Violin Conc...
On iTunes, pressing and holding over a song shows the complete track label.
They seem to be trapped in a featuritis loop, giving no priority to feature polish.Once, they had a Flash video of a concert on the first tab of their app that was impossible to stop playing. The best you could do was play your music loudly over it.
The disconcerting part (which may have just been left out) is that there is no trash bin in the tweak it stage. That seems fairly standard and how you get into a piece of bloated software that just keeps piling on features without making things easier. It could also be that these ideas are also getting rid of features rather than just adding them but that is not how it read to me.