I wonder what the big picture is here, who is really behind it.
There has to have been some company lobbying their asses off, a company either already in this business or a company expanding.
Is it true that its Huawei?
Is it true that its Huawei?
If that is true, then who are the people that came up with this plan? Has there been a company that has been lobbying just to sell more equipment? Are people in the government realizing that free flow of information makes their jobs harder? Or do they want to trick people into believing that they care about the children?
What's really frustrating is that, while people report on things like this, you never really seem to understand what the main driving force is behind decisions like these.
The same political party that legislated Section 28 in the 80s is the same political party pushing the filters today.
It's simply about suppressing information about ideas and lifestyles the Conservatives and Daily Mail readers do not approve of. It really is that simple.